Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625

If the laws need tweaking, I’m fine with their being tweaked. There are many “religions” in the world, however, and if we start getting into the fine points of who can refuse what to whom for what reason, there will be no end to it. We could be in for some nasty surprises, as well.

The principle should be nondiscrimination, not a total eradication of the concept that a business is a semi-public entity. Unfortunately, there has been such a complete destruction of the concept of community standards that something like that would probably never hold up in court again.


65 posted on 03/03/2014 3:39:53 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: firebrand
The principle should be nondiscrimination, not a total eradication of the concept that a business is a semi-public entity.

And here's where we disagree. I'm in favor of businesses having the right refuse to interact with anyone, for any reason, or no stated reason.

66 posted on 03/03/2014 3:43:10 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson