Posted on 03/03/2014 6:58:47 PM PST by SoConPubbie
The chairman of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Subcommittee for the Promotion and Defense of Marriage has endorsed the State Marriage Defense Act of 2014, which has been introduced in the Senate by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-FL).
Various agencies of the Executive Branch-- most recently the Department of Justice by order of Attorney General Holder-- have decided to use a place of celebration rule rather than a place of domicile rule when determining the validity of a marriage for purposes of federal rights, benefits, and privileges, Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone said in a letter to Cruz. The effect, if not the intent, of this choice is to circumvent state laws defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Your bill would remedy this problem by requiring the federal government
to defer to the marriage law of the state in which people actually reside when determining whether they are married for purposes of federal law, added the prelate, who endorsed similar House legislation in January.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ted Cruz Ping!
If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
Sen Ted Cruz (R-FL)?
I wish.
“”If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.” - Samuel Adams”
Mr. Adams, your words have never been more applicable than today....
there are those who profess to represent us, but are actually in league with our enemies...
there is one who pretends to be a president, but again, is in league with our enemies...
and there are Nine judges who promise adherence to the application of our constitution, but who, in reality, twist it into something unrecognizable.
A question :
Where is the remedy?
It seems that this bill would compliment Section 2 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which, regardless that the corrupt, pro-gay media wants everybody to think is unconstitutional, is evidently still in effect.
Section 2. Powers reserved to the statesNo State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship.
Wait, so is Cruz the typo, or FL?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.