Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS: Arizona can't withhold Planned Parenthood funds over abortion
Howard Fischer of Capitol Media Services published in the Arizona Daily Star ^ | 24 Feb | Howard Fischer, Capitol Media Services

Posted on 03/05/2014 10:28:27 AM PST by mbarker12474

February 24, 2014 9:33 am • By Howard Fischer Capitol Media Services 17

PHOENIX — Arizona cannot cut off family planning funding to Planned Parenthood simply because the organization also provides abortions, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled this morning.

Without comment the justices rejected... privately financed anti-abortion group to overturn lower court rulings ...

Both Arizona and federal laws already bar....

But the state,... participation in the federal Medicaid program, ... federal government pays 90 percent....

Medicaid law ... has included Planned Parenthood.

... Rep. Justin Olson, R-Mesa, who sponsored the legislation, ...

... Appellate Judge Marsha Berzon said ...... any qualified provider. ...

Attorney General Tom Horne,...

(Excerpt) Read more at azstarnet.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: abortion; arizona; medicaid; plannedparenthood; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Lurking Libertarian; ZULU

Yeah, and that appears to be the root of the problem. The states (and we the people) would all be a lot better off if they told the feds to shove their blood money and the strings attached. We’d rather retain our freedom, thankyouverymuch. And where do the feds get that money anyway? They rob it from the taxpayers. It’s tyranny.


21 posted on 03/05/2014 1:00:39 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Lurking Libertarian

I keep thinking that that Convention of the States to adopt specific amendments as outlined by Mark Levin in the Liberty Amendments might be the best way to go.


22 posted on 03/05/2014 1:08:46 PM PST by ZULU (Magua is sitting in the Oval Office. Ted Cruz/Phil Robertson in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
Soto-Mayor, Bader-Ginsburg, Breyer, Roberts and Kennedy will always tag-team us on social issues. THis is no longer a COnservative Court. Muchas Gracias Jorge El Segundo!!!

This wasn't a ruling, just a denial of cert. And not one Justice dissented.

23 posted on 03/05/2014 1:20:46 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Screw Roberts and his merry band of robbers. They take from everybody and keep it for themselves.

As Andrew Jackson said: “(Chief Justice) Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it.


24 posted on 03/05/2014 1:24:59 PM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

25 posted on 03/05/2014 7:43:40 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Screw the farmers. I can get everything I need at the grocery store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson