Skip to comments.
Mass. High Court: Subway Upskirt Photos Not Illegal
WBZ-TV Boston ^
| 3/5/2014
| None credited
Posted on 03/05/2014 5:07:36 PM PST by RightGeek
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
To: RightGeek
Well I guess it all depends upon one’s perspective.
To: exit82
if I caught him taking a panty shot of my wife, Girl friend, mom or sister, he would have a colonoscopy done with that camera.
42
posted on
03/06/2014 4:15:24 AM PST
by
Yorlik803
( Church/Caboose in 2016)
To: Revolting cat!
I thought I was the only one who remembered such advanced techniques. Now, I suppose they’ll be putting Google Glasses on their shoes. iPeds for your feet (or eyePeds).
43
posted on
03/06/2014 12:32:51 PM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(The Texas judge's decision was to pave the way for same sex divorce for two Massachusetts women.)
To: Teacher317; Revolting cat!; Pollster1
Such laws would discriminate against voyeurs.
44
posted on
03/06/2014 12:33:22 PM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(The Texas judge's decision was to pave the way for same sex divorce for two Massachusetts women.)
To: RightGeek
Another protected class: crack photographers.
45
posted on
03/06/2014 12:38:20 PM PST
by
N. Theknow
(Kennedys-Can't drive, can't ski, can't fly, can't skipper a boat-But they know what's best for you.)
To: Revolting cat!
Charming. God bless the little ones.
46
posted on
03/07/2014 6:53:48 PM PST
by
Broker
(Shalom y'all)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson