“Are you saying that you’d be OK if some guy did that to your wife or daughter?”
Way below average strawman.
I believe your objection was that the location of the camera was not given in the article. The title of the piece referred to “upskirting”, the physics of which implies that the position of the camera is distinctly below the picture-taker’s waist. Even if the law does not explicitly prohibit such acts, I would think that anyone with a remote sense of morality would consider photography of that sort to be out of bounds. But, if the words of the law are all that matter, then you have defined your position. Mine differs from that.