He is of mixed ancestry.
Why is this relevant?
To: PaulCruz2016
Plus, he’s about the leftmost crazy they could readily get their mitts on.
Oh, don’t got there? Why not?
2 posted on
03/06/2014 4:58:01 AM PST by
Flintlock
( islam is a LIE, mohammed was a CRIMINAL, sharia is POISON.)
To: PaulCruz2016
“He defended a very unpopular killer”
This may be a clue to Judges, like Roberts, who
hold the actual Constitution in contempt as they
write “laws” on the fly, and lie in Court,
... to help criminals.
To: PaulCruz2016
It’s one of the “race” buttons liberals like to push.
4 posted on
03/06/2014 4:59:05 AM PST by
Eric in the Ozarks
("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
To: PaulCruz2016
Competence requires melanin - did you miss the fundamental transformation?
5 posted on
03/06/2014 4:59:19 AM PST by
Aevery_Freeman
(Historians will refer to this administration as "The Half-Black Plague.")
To: PaulCruz2016
The 50 senators voting on this judges appointment was like voting for&against a “King George/Castro Like” individual to be a leading civil rights Judge/Magistrate.
To: PaulCruz2016
To: PaulCruz2016
Two words for this idiot: Miguel Estrada
8 posted on
03/06/2014 5:07:41 AM PST by
ken5050
(I fear a world run by adults who were never spanked as kids and got trophies just for participating)
To: PaulCruz2016
"He represented a death row inmate convicted for murder."This may accurately reflect what Roberts did and there's nothing wrong with "representing" murderers. That's the job of a lawyer.
But that misrepresents what Adegbile did in the Mumia case. He joined the radical leftwing propaganda campaign and praised Mumia to the heavens. He was a political partisan, not a person who could objectively enforce the law and enforce civil rights laws on a colorblind basis.
Adegbile, don't let the door hit you in the butt on your way out. Good riddance.
9 posted on
03/06/2014 5:16:43 AM PST by
Jabba the Nutt
(You can have a free country or government schools. Choose one.)
To: PaulCruz2016
He was unfairly rejected For a fleeting moment I thought this headline was for an article about Judge Robert Bork.
10 posted on
03/06/2014 5:20:55 AM PST by
Iron Munro
(Albert Einstein: The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
To: PaulCruz2016
Probably the most shallow construct I’ve ever read.
Thanks for posting. Interesting and informative of liberal faux-logic.
11 posted on
03/06/2014 5:23:08 AM PST by
Ouchthatonehurt
("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
To: PaulCruz2016
Roberts is of mixed ancestry? What British and Irish? What a weird comment.
And yes, there are depraved worthless humans who still have to be defended
12 posted on
03/06/2014 5:25:19 AM PST by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: PaulCruz2016
Why is this relevant?It was part of a rhetorical bait-and-switch designed to evoke an outraged response from liberals who thought they knew who the author was talking about.
To: PaulCruz2016
The leftists whining about Debo's rejection always conveniently 'forget' one critical point. The nay votes came not because of Debo's defense of a guilty man, they come because Debo led demonstrations intended to hide the fact the the man was guilty. Debo used deceptive practices to attempt to free a guilty man.
Besides, any adult who takes on the name of a Sesame Street character isn't worthy of leading anything.
18 posted on
03/06/2014 7:18:33 AM PST by
norwaypinesavage
(Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
To: PaulCruz2016
If the writer think he's making his readers think twice about yesterday's rejection of Adegbile by comparing him to John Roberts he's dead wrong.
Speaking for myself, at least.
20 posted on
03/06/2014 7:28:52 AM PST by
skeeter
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson