Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie
Nor does our concern about those creatures give us the moral right to control those who do not share those concerns.

I'm not sure I can agree with that 100%. We have laws against animal cruelty. But if you are making the argument about food animals in a barnyard, then it's valid.

106 posted on 03/08/2014 1:31:34 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Cyber Liberty
We have laws against animal cruelty.

There are moral rights and legal rights.

To take forcible control of other people's property when it its use has no direct affect upon us is an act of covetousness. Hence, an act of animal cruelty beyond the property of another is a matter of collective interest.

But if you are making the argument about food animals in a barnyard, then it's valid.

It is better to work on the heart of the perp than to invoke the power of the state simply because elevating such to a matter of police power is a threat to all, as who controls the state then controls all property.

116 posted on 03/08/2014 1:43:53 PM PST by Carry_Okie (ObamaCare: Make them pay; do not delay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson