Posted on 03/10/2014 5:23:27 AM PDT by SJackson
No.
They blame Republicans, and Obama tells them to.
Obama could shoot most liberal’s grandma in the face, and they would lament the fact that Republican policies made such a shooting unavoidable.
Anyone who would answer yes to this would also believe one can pick up a turd by the clean end. Liberals will do what liberals do; blame the failures on someone else. Would not surprise me if we wake up some morning and the NYT Editorial pages are blaming Obama's failures on Republican opposition to climate change legislation.
Yes but he is a clean, articulate negro with a real nice smile!!
Liberals never admit the failures of their beliefs for a couple of reasons. Most are liberals in order to have some sense of moral or intellectual superiority over others.
The most compelling reason, though, is that they have their innate sense of salvation wrapped up in their belief in their own “goodness” for believing and supporting these myths.
LOL- funniest headline I have seen in a long time
I have 2 rabid anti American liberal Demonrats in my
Family- reject O’bummer ?- Never
Reject God?- always
denigrate Christian values - Always
Vote 100% for either the Demon party, or if there is a stronger COMMUNIST- always
It is pretty simple:
A. They reject God
B. They Curse the Savior, Jesus
C. They hate themselves, AND their Family
They welcome evil at every turn-
That includes O’bummer
Their heads are so far up Bomo’s rear they will never see the light.
Except for the articulate part. Obama’s probably the only below average intelligence President.
Joe Biden at the 2012 democrat convention.
bush’s fault
Sure...and in the next breath they’ll tell you how much they support Hillary Clinton.
Obamian kum-ba-yah diplomacy only works when the opponent is equally stoned.
Might I suggest a slight correction/clarification?
Most are liberals in order to have some sense of moral or intellectual superiority over others, without actually having to do perform the hard intellectual and spiritual work necessary to BE a person of moral or intellectual excellence.
Yes, they’re lazy.
I call it “advocacy-based righteousness”.
All they have to do to “be a good person” is advocate for policies that “help people”.
This is even one more step removed from the “works-based righteousness” of most other world religions.
Liberals have a cultist adoration of their idols, and will not give them up easily...too much group thinking going on with the progressives. The only real criticism I’ve ever see is that Obama isn’t far enough to the left.
Amazingly, I have a relative who thinks Obama is doing a good job...when pointing out his many failures, he thinks it is because I am out of mind....
Oh come on, obummer deserves some RSPECT!
Ha haa!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.