Skip to comments.Iranian man bought tickets for stolen passport pair on missing Malaysian Airlines jet
Posted on 03/10/2014 2:06:39 PM PDT by barmag25
FBI are after Iranian who bought tickets for flight and say Chinese Martyrs Brigade is a red herring.
A mystery Iranian called Mr Ali bought tickets for two passengers who used stolen passports on the missing Malaysian plane, it has been revealed.
Mr Ali purchased them - in cash - from a travel agent after insisting he wanted cheap flights.
(Excerpt) Read more at mirror.co.uk ...
Mr. Ali, huh?
Mr. Ali...cheapest flights from Indonesia to Bali.
No credit? No problem. We’ll finance. Our cash, you carry!
Do we know for sure mr Ali is Iranian ?
This is getting all WWIII ish.
If this bears out, expect a strongly worded email from Obama to Iran with a threat of a “really gosh-darn bad” civil action in DC courts.
Yahoo, citing the financial times says the pair with the stolen passports were middle eastern
so the FBI was asked by the Thai government to assist?? Certainly they have no authority otherwise, do they?
A top terrorism expert says the use of stolen passports on flight MH370 ‘’eerily’’ resembles a 1994 attack on a Philippines flight by an al-Qaeda-linked hijacker and represents a ‘’massive security failure’’.
Question: We know the Malaysians did NOT check the passports departing — would the welcoming country check them on arrival? Assuming they had made it to Amsterdam or wherever their final destination was — just wondering how the arrival end works having never flown internationally myself.
If true, the Iranians shouldn’t screw with the Chinese. They have leadership that will respond appropriately.
When flying international anywhere in the world your passport gets checked at least 3 times before boarding.
Should be no problem finding Mr Ali. A very uncommon name in the Middle East.
re: passport gets checked 3 times
Is that just an official looking at it and seeing if you match the photo? Would that be the “check”?
Straits-Times reporting that the jet was turning back toward Kuala Lampur
Not in places like Kuala Lumpur, apparently. They checked the passports, and while the holders apparently looked nothing like people of that name (both were Africans, while they had one Italian and one Swiss(?) passport), they let them on through. However, while their visual and inquisitive skills may have been lacking, the real problem is that they never checked the Interpol database of stolen passports. So even if they did look at the passports 3 times, they sure didn’t do it with much attention or ability to detect anomalies.
This was even though these two had one-way tickets together to Amsterdam (thus sparing them another passport check in Beijing) and then separate European destinations after that - bought by a third party with a Middle Eastern name.
I mean, what the heck else did they need? This was one big red flag.
Distance from Iran to Vietnam is: 3404.2 Miles
( 5478.6 Kilometers / 2956.2 Nautical Miles )
Approximate flight duration time from Tehran, Iran to Hanoi, Vietnam is 7 hrs, 4 mins
2. NO wreckage found at all
3. Ticket buyer was Iranian
777 stolen for future use in dramatic Iranian terror attack...???
is there a treaty involved? or just a friendly nation relationship?
It’s hard to believe the Iranian state would sponsor terror against an alley, which is very much what China is to Iran. Iran sells oil in anything BUT the US dollar and China is thier biggest buyer. Both have thier own vested interest in the death of the petro-dollar.
There is however now “good” and “bad” Al Quida. Good Al Quida are the freedom fighters Obama supports in Syria. Bad Al Quida is what we’ve otherwise known for two decades. Is there a real difference? Probably none. Are they allied to anyone beyond some immediate strategic goal? No?
Creating a fracture between China and Iran is a goal of “good” Al Quida and just coincidental coincidence it is US policy.
What is a lone Boeing 777-200 doing on an Iranian airbase near Konarak Iran northeast of Chabahar Bay at coordinates 25deg 16’ 15.75” N / 60deg 22’ 45.35” E.
Google earth image 3/3/2013. From last year but appears to be a 777-200 in Iran of coast near Straights of Hormuz.
Mine always gets scanned at check in and then once at security and once more when boarding.
plane diverted to a remote airfield?
According to my Chinese wife who regularly peruses Chinese Web-Sites, some of the people awaiting friends and family have called the cell phones of the missing. The phones ring, but no one answers...
If the phones were wet or destroyed, would they ring?
Pretty good article on phone technology here:
Does scanned mean putting thru some kind of computer or machine — would NOT a canceled/stolen passport show up in a “scan”?
Also — my original question — What happens at Arrival a/p —do they do the same “scan”?
I think after 9/11 the US was especially wary of anyone who booked one-way, AND paid cash — guess we were the only ones — but I would think Europe would be extra vigilant.
Yes. The caller hears ringing, but it's just an electronic convenience the cell carrier provides to let the caller know there's an effort to connect. I have called a cell that is dead and hasn't been used in six months, and I hear a ringing noise. Means nothing. As long as the bill is paid, there is going to be a ring.
Never have flown internationally. Have another link on this story only ... http://news.yahoo.com/stolen-passports-probed-malaysian-plane-mystery-174324605—finance.html;_ylt=An1u9GImY7r28XfxiJj_.VYJVux_;_ylu=X3oDMTFyMXFzaGNjBG1pdANBVFQgSG9tZSBUb2RheSBNb2R1bGUgMTEyMTEzBHBvcwM3NwRzZWMDTWVkaWFDZHRUb2RheVYy;_ylg=X3oDMTFkcW51ZGliBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDBHBzdGNhdANob21lBHB0A3BtaA—;_ylv=3
Funny how the Chinese have been very quiet about this.
Yes it would ring. lol
They are either part of this, or the luckiest bastards in the world. Either way, I'd like to know who they are.
The aircraft may re-appear as a carrier for Iran’s nuke to Israel or Washington.
Good summary. I am also curious about the five that checked in and did not board. Granted their luggage was removed, but what items could they have taken into the boarding lounge. The carry on liquids could very well have been used for binary explosives. Were these five passengers in contact with the two on stolen passports? Many questions.
Last report I read said the five are being investigated.
re: the 5 are be3ing investigated
by who? Reading the Yahoo article where it is well known and just accepted fact that “often people fly with fake passports” — an investigation by these people does not make one confident of any answer they come up with.
Inside link at post #30 states the five are being investigated but does not name by whom. Am just repeating what have read inside the link.
Scanned when checking in, but I don’t know if airlines are scanning Interpol. I think it may just be looking at the no fly list.
When I arrive in most countries it doesn’t get scanned. Just returning back to to the U.S.
Interpol: 40 million worldwide cases of passengers travelling with false passports.
From what have read, Interpol states they had the passports flagged but the passports were not verified through them for this flight. Seems to be a common practice to not verify through Interpol. Don’t know why is not done unless is too time consuming but am making an assumption and I don’t like making assumptions.
I worked with USAF mobile military Radars for 17 years. Both the TPS-43E and did IOT&E and First Article Test on the TPS-75. For the lay-person, they only know of one type of Radar, and that is the primary Radar that reflects the RF pulse back to the Radar antenna which gives azimuth and range to the aircraft. There is secondary radar which goes under several different acronyms, but the one that people use the most is IFF. That snow plow in the front of the curved Radar antenna is the IFF antenna.
IFF Radar sends a pulse toward the aircraft and the aircraft transponder automatically answers it with the appropriate dialed-in code, unless the transponder is turned off or if it is malfunctioning. Aircraft transiting international airspace must have a working transponder or they will be denied entry into another countries airspace. Since Viet Nam said they had it on Radar, the IFF transponder was working. Ive tracked aircraft through the European Alps using only secondary Radar because the primary Radar RF was getting scattered by the mountains.
Another problem with primary Radar is the curvature of the earth. A Radar antenna mounted on the ground can only see an aircraft at ground level only out to about 25 miles. There is a formula that is used to determine distance to horizon based on the altitude of the antenna. Airborne Radar antennas (E-2 and E-3) are the best which is why the military uses them so much.
Now heres where Im in a quandary. Using the TPS-43E as an example (ease of math), it turned at 6 rpm. This means that every 10 seconds it made one ration. If I had a primary Radar return on an aircraft at 35K ft, even in a crowbar decent (as air traffic controllers call it) I should be able to get at least 3 good returns on it before, well, you know. But Im not privy anymore to what Radar system the Viet Nam controllers were using, where it is or how reliable it is.
Second factor is that if there was a midair explosion, the debris (parts of the airplane) would create a cloud affect on any Radar in the area indicating what has happened. Think electronic Radar jamming and chaff.
Third problem is the theory that its been hijacked. I dont put into this because the area where the aircraft disappeared is a heavily traveled maritime route. Think of the Washington DC beltway. Any large aircraft flying low to avoid Radar would have been sighted by numerous cargo vessels.
So, has anybody checked out to see where Rod Serling is? (cue Twilight Zone music)
One doubts that the Shiite Iranians would be involved with Uighar or Thai terrorists, since Alqaeda is Sunni, and Iran is Shiite. And given that China is a major trading partner for Iran’s oil, I doubt they would bomb a plane and make China angry.
I’m not sure, but I have a friend in the FBI who has been all over the world on various calls, investigations and training assignments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.