Skip to comments.
Two Of The GOP's Top Presidential Prospects Are Engaged In A Very Public Feud
Business Insider ^
| March 10, 2014
| Brett LoGiurato
Posted on 03/10/2014 4:35:26 PM PDT by Mariner
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-169 last
To: ansel12
"And hell yes I would deny them "spousal rights". I don't support the Feds being involved in marriage, at all.
From my post #108 that I believe you did not read entirely.
161
posted on
03/11/2014 2:14:35 PM PDT
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Mariner
Of course I read it, and responded to the strange post you made ignoring yet again the issue with childish avoidance.
In post 12 I told you. “”You keep slipping around the marriage issue, again, federal law HAS to address marriage at the federal level, for instance for military personnel.
Would you ever grant homosexual military the same spousal rights as heterosexual members?””
162
posted on
03/11/2014 2:18:23 PM PDT
by
ansel12
((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
To: ansel12
federal law HAS to address marriage at the federal level, for instance for military personnel.
It absolutely does not. All the federal government has to recognize is a contract.
Letting the federal government define/decide what is and isn't marriage from the beginning is what created this mess.
163
posted on
03/11/2014 2:27:07 PM PDT
by
randomhero97
("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
To: randomhero97
You must not know anything about military life, the military has to deal with married personnel and their spouses in housing, security, travel, health care, everything.
The feds have to have their own definitions of marriage for the military, federal employment, immigration, and they always have.
There was NEVER a time when the Federal government was not making law regarding marriage at the federal level.
164
posted on
03/11/2014 2:40:42 PM PDT
by
ansel12
((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
To: ansel12
"You keep slipping around the marriage issue, again, federal law HAS to address marriage at the federal level, for instance for military personnel."
You make that assertion as if it's absolute fact because you said so. That's like saying government must continue to fund Social Security indefinitely. Or that the USA can never default on its' debt.
165
posted on
03/11/2014 2:52:30 PM PDT
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: ansel12
" I oppose what you are for libertarianism I knew I was wasting my time on you.
166
posted on
03/11/2014 3:23:31 PM PDT
by
jpsb
(Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
To: Mariner
It is absolute fact, the military could not operate by suddenly deciding that in it’s eyes, everyone is single and always will be.
The feds have to decide if a person trying to immigrate is married or not.
Do you really think the founders didn’t know the constitution, or the realities of life when they were writing marriage law at the federal level in 1780, 1784, 1798, 1802?
167
posted on
03/11/2014 3:29:21 PM PDT
by
ansel12
((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
To: jpsb
Well yeah, I won’t reject GOD and country, and conservatism and start supporting social liberalism.
168
posted on
03/11/2014 3:32:51 PM PDT
by
ansel12
((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
To: Mariner
Anything to avoid answering the simple question to reveal how far your pro-gay agenda goes.
With hetro marriage in the military being fully recognized, do you support the military not recognizing gay marriage while they do recognize normal marriage?
169
posted on
03/11/2014 4:59:08 PM PDT
by
ansel12
((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-169 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson