Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mysteries of Deep Often Solved in Air Accidents Over Water
gCaptain ^ | March 10, 2014 | Alan Levin

Posted on 03/10/2014 7:12:53 PM PDT by artichokegrower

Teams searching for the wide-body jetliner that vanished off Vietnam almost certainly will locate it and figure out what brought it down, according to aviation investigators and case files spanning four decades.

Planes seemingly lost without a trace in waters miles deep have been found by remote-controlled submarines, or investigators gathered enough clues to determine what happened, according to accident reports since 1970.

(Excerpt) Read more at gcaptain.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Investigators analyzed wreckage pulled from the ocean floor to determine that a bomb in the forward cargo hold brought down an Air India Boeing 747 off the coast of Ireland in 1985, killing 329 people, according to the agency then known as the Canadian Aviation Safety Board


An act of terrorism lost in history

It was the first bombing of a 747 jumbo jet. The 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie used a similar method, with explosives placed in a radio inside a bag and detonation by timer; no passenger accompanied either bomb. The 1985 explosion and downing of the Air India plane occurred within an hour of the fatal Narita Airport bombing. It was also conducted by Sikh terrorists from Canada. In this case, a bag exploded on the ground before being placed on another Air India flight. Evidence from the explosion pointed to an attempt to blow up two airliners simultaneously.

1 posted on 03/10/2014 7:12:53 PM PDT by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

I’m not saying it’s Cthulhu, but ... it’s Cthulhu.


2 posted on 03/10/2014 7:14:04 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Certainly appears to be a bomb.


3 posted on 03/10/2014 7:45:10 PM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
Mysteries of Deep Often Solved in Air Accidents Over Water...
Planes seemingly lost without a trace in waters miles deep have been found by remote-controlled submarines, or investigators gathered enough clues to determine what happened, according to accident reports since 1970.

Somebody got to excited about writing a story about mysteries of the deep, that they are making fools of themselves.

The entire seas around Cambodia, Malaysia and Vietnam in the TOTAL sea area where the Malaysian airliner could have gone down is---------------
less than 250 feet deep!

4 posted on 03/10/2014 7:52:42 PM PDT by publius911 ( At least Nixon had the good g race to resign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

well the whole airplane is a tube filled some people with diesel fuel surrounding them and a lot of electrical stuff in between. flying along at 400 knts. not similar but a propane car is a bomb and many on the road at one time going 60-70 mph is a catastrophe.


5 posted on 03/10/2014 8:00:47 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

My personal opinion is that it did not crash.


6 posted on 03/10/2014 8:02:30 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

I think it accidentally went into orbit.


7 posted on 03/10/2014 8:10:25 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2

“not similar but a propane car is a bomb and many on the road at one time going 60-70 mph is a catastrophe.”
_____________________________________________________
Well yes, but jets run on fuel that is more like kerosene, hardly anything like propane. No, I would never have a propane powered car. Fortunately for me, I no longer have or need a car, and have not had one since 2004.


8 posted on 03/10/2014 8:11:51 PM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

“My personal opinion is that it did not crash.”
___________________________________________________
Are you implying that it landed somewhere? Possible, but very farfetched.


9 posted on 03/10/2014 8:15:54 PM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

Yes. Even EgyptAir flight 990 after been dived into the ocean had some, but not a lot of, debris that was found floating at the surface of the ocean.


10 posted on 03/10/2014 8:17:11 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

It was clearly caught in a Tractor Beam, possibly by the Starship Enterprise from some unknown future year and is probably being held for examination.


11 posted on 03/10/2014 8:34:23 PM PDT by Rembrandt (Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
seemingly lost without a trace in waters miles deep

Of course, though the waters of the primary search area are not miles deep. That straight between Malay and Viet-Nam is not the Abyss. I don't think you will find waters there more than 200 feet deep, and less, on average.

The longer the sea-search comes up with zero, the higher the likelihood this was a very sophisticated hijacking. A fully fueled 777-200 SR could be in Somalia, or due east in the southern Philippines or Banda Aceh.

12 posted on 03/10/2014 8:37:19 PM PDT by Prospero (Si Deus trucido mihi, ego etiam fides Deus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
My personal opinion is that it did not crash.

What is the likelihood that the plane is sitting on the ground in some jerkwater muslim stronghold?

Probably fairly good odds.


13 posted on 03/10/2014 9:27:13 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Albert Einstein: The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

I am sure that satellites have already been searching for just this possibility.


14 posted on 03/11/2014 4:28:57 AM PDT by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
Clearly trapped in one of Sanderson's "vile vortices."


15 posted on 03/11/2014 4:34:42 AM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

That is my gut feeling as well. But the nagging implication of that thought is it needs an 8,000 foot runway.


16 posted on 03/11/2014 4:36:47 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson