If you are knowledgeable and have solid references that disagree with those in the article, you, that is you an ordinary cotton picker, or anybody else, can add to the article. Anybody can edit a wiki piece with what ever they want. But good solid info with good reference citations is what wiki is for. That is to provide good information. A reader with the information you think should have would have both sides of the subject.
If you look closely at the end of each sub title block there is a [edit] sign. If you click on that it will open an edit page that allows you to add what you want. To do so you must develop a log on ID and pass word. Note also there is a
History tab that indicates all the various edits since te first writing. You might want to look at that to get a feel for how people have worked on this specific piece.
Particularly good and getting brownie points is citing another wiki article that agrees with your view or reference citations. That reference calls up the url of a different article on something of interest in the article being edited.
Any way, it’s a challenge to mess with
Learning Wiki is hard for a new piece, but not so hard for editing an existing article.
True. I’d give that comment to the author.
However, this is not to say that the author’s observations about the Wiki Page on Global Warming AS IT STANDS NOW are without merit.