Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teacher orders boy, 10, to remove Help for Heroes wristband worn in memory of Lee Rigby
UK Daily Mail ^ | Mar 12, 2014 | Mark Duell

Posted on 03/12/2014 8:08:34 AM PDT by KeyLargo

Teacher orders boy, 10, to remove Help for Heroes wristband worn in memory of Lee Rigby 'because it might cause offence'

By Mark Duell

PUBLISHED: 04:33 EST, 12 March 2014

A teacher allegedly ordered a 10-year-old boy to take off his Help for Heroes wristband because it could cause offence.

Tracy Tew was shocked when her son Charlie was put on a report card at Maldon Primary School in Essex after he refused to take off the charity rubber bracelet sold to honour injured soldiers.

Charlie wears the wristband - bought at the Colchester Military Festival - in honour of murdered solider Lee Rigby and service personnel in his family, including his great-granddad and uncle.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: academicbias; education; islam; islamicimperialism; islamicsupremacists; islamonazism; leerigby; lifeamongthekufir; muslims; soldiers; teacher; terror; thereisnoenglandnow; tyranny; warcrimes; waronterror

Tracy Tew's son Charlie was put on report card at Maldon Primary School

Refused to take off charity rubber bracelet sold to honour injured soldiers

Charlie wears item in honour of Rigby and service personnel in his family

Mrs Tew, 38, says: 'We are really proud of Charlie for sticking to his guns'

Essex school insists wearing any wristband is against its jewellery policy

H4H 'haven't heard of any health and safety incident connected to them'

1 posted on 03/12/2014 8:08:34 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

2 posted on 03/12/2014 8:10:57 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

‘because it might cause offence’

The dumb teacher brought MORE attention to it by objecting to it...


3 posted on 03/12/2014 8:12:49 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

It’s becoming time to “offend back” the Obamaholes who are “offended”.

They get offended.

We out offend them by 10 dB. (Look it up, libtards.)


4 posted on 03/12/2014 8:12:58 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

England is case in point. Abandon God and the pagans will fall against you, just ask the Ancient Israelites. Muslims now run the UK, and they’ll be setting up pedophile summer camps in the fall.


5 posted on 03/12/2014 8:13:40 AM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Muzzy Common Core type schools can’t have an infidel reminding the public that their kind ran a soldier down and then proceeded to stab and hack him to death with blades. No, no that’s politically incorrect to accuse your Muslim brethren of doing that when it was viewed by witnesses in public areas.


6 posted on 03/12/2014 8:14:19 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Active defiance is needed. Refuse to comply.


7 posted on 03/12/2014 8:15:50 AM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Islam is evil and must be eradicated


8 posted on 03/12/2014 8:15:57 AM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

I’d beat that heifer with a frying pan.


9 posted on 03/12/2014 8:16:13 AM PDT by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

When I was in elementary school, kids had Vietnam POWs bracelets, then again, we didn’t have the right not to be offended but none of us knew anything about Vietnam either.
I get the feeling that today, teachers force their views on kids so kids know GWB was evil and Odinga is their master.


10 posted on 03/12/2014 8:16:46 AM PDT by Lx (Do you like it? Do you like it, Scott? I call it, "Mr. & Mrs. Tenorman Chili.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

When will we start telling these idiots:

“AND I’M OFFENDED BY YOUR STUPIDITY! SO THE WRISTBAND STAYS!”

???


11 posted on 03/12/2014 8:17:28 AM PDT by G Larry (There's the Beef!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Can teachers be removed for being offensive?


12 posted on 03/12/2014 8:18:37 AM PDT by bubbacluck (America 180)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Goodness gracious, not to give “offense”.

Especially to the homocidal maniacs who are Muslims and recent imports to Old Blighty.

I wish Alfred the Great, or Longshanks, or some other REAL Briton could arise from the grave, expel all those monsters and deal with his own people who have become so pusillanimous and cowardly.


13 posted on 03/12/2014 8:19:00 AM PDT by ZULU (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
it could cause offence. ?....................
14 posted on 03/12/2014 8:22:02 AM PDT by Red Badger (LIberal is an oxymoron......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Anything that is patriotic or supports Western culture is “Offensive” to immigrants. What does it say about the immigrants?


15 posted on 03/12/2014 8:23:17 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

“because it could cause offence”

Perhaps the teacher “offended” the boy by telling him to remove it? Do you think that stupid twit thought of THAT?


16 posted on 03/12/2014 8:24:02 AM PDT by ryan71 (The Partisans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

Yeah, might as well give ‘em a real reason. If that was me in the 4th or 5th grade, I might have told the teacher to “eat me”.


17 posted on 03/12/2014 8:27:14 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

'Could cause offence': Tracy Tew was shocked when her son Charlie was put on a report card at Maldon Primary School in Essex after he refused to take off the charity rubber bracelet sold to honour injured soldiers

18 posted on 03/12/2014 8:30:20 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

I read the whole article, at the beginning it says something about someone (and never says who) might be offended. Then later the article quotes the Headteacher Tracy Thornton insisted wearing wristbands is against the school’s jewellery policy.

So which one is it? Apparently they can’t get their stupid reasons together.


19 posted on 03/12/2014 8:30:56 AM PDT by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

Eradication of Islam will first require the nuclear obliteration of Mecca, the Kaaba, the cursed Black Stone (which is nothing but pieces), the Grand Mosque; followed by the Dome of the Rock, Al-Aqsa mosque, the cities of Qom & Qarbala (where pious muzzies bloody themselves) & the cave of the Twelfth Imam.

Just for starters. Muzzies mean to conquer the world even if by murdering one “infidel” at a time. They’ll never stop.

Would love to see a headline in the Daily Mail “Muslim attackers beaten to death by angry counterattackers shouting `Drummer Rigby!’”.


20 posted on 03/12/2014 8:32:04 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Liberalism IS a mental disorder.


21 posted on 03/12/2014 8:34:09 AM PDT by Amagi (Lenin: "Socialized Medicine is the Keystone to the Arch of the Socialist State.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

So the boy is honoring an innocent person murdered by a subhuman bearded savages, and is disciplined.

The school has taken the side of the humanoid fanatical murderer.


22 posted on 03/12/2014 8:34:59 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Amagi

And in other news.

Judge sets hearing on request to drop some charges against Boston Marathon bombing suspect

Published March 12, 2014

| Associated Press

BOSTON – A hearing on a request to dismiss some of the charges against the surviving Boston Marathon bombing suspect will be held a year and a day after the deadly blasts.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (joh-HAHR’ tsahr-NEYE’-ehv) also wants a judge to lift special restrictions placed on him while he awaits trial.


23 posted on 03/12/2014 8:35:20 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

The teacher has NO right to object to something like a bracelet unless ALL children are forbidden to wear bracelets.


24 posted on 03/12/2014 8:36:33 AM PDT by ThomasMore (Islam is the Whore of Babylon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Amagi
Liberalism is a Sin
25 posted on 03/12/2014 8:38:36 AM PDT by ThomasMore (Islam is the Whore of Babylon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

The only person “offended” was this Muslim-loving teacher.


26 posted on 03/12/2014 8:44:08 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
She said: ‘They are not allowed to wear jewellery, and that includes wristbands, for health and safety reasons because they could get caught.

because they do have a school policy, this is all the teacher should have said... she was dumb to say anything about it possibly causing offence... all she had to do was enforce the school policy...

27 posted on 03/12/2014 8:49:45 AM PDT by latina4dubya (when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left, i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore
The teacher has NO right to object to something like a bracelet unless ALL children are forbidden to wear bracelets.

all children are forbidden... other than watches and tiny studs, no jewelry is allowed... including wristbands... according to the article...

28 posted on 03/12/2014 8:51:41 AM PDT by latina4dubya (when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left, i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

It’s expected. It’s the UK after all.


29 posted on 03/12/2014 8:56:04 AM PDT by SkyDancer (I Believe In The Law Until It Intereferes With Justice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
he refused to take off the charity rubber bracelet

Good for him. A well educated and smart boy. Stand defiant in the face of idiocy.

30 posted on 03/12/2014 9:04:46 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Truth sounds like hate...to those who hate truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya
all children are forbidden... other than watches and tiny studs, no jewelry is allowed... including wristbands... according to the article...

There is functionally no difference between a rubber wrist band and a wrist watch. In fact, a watch is more dangerous because it wouldn't stretch if caught on a fixed object. The "safety" argument is pure liberal BS.

31 posted on 03/12/2014 9:05:30 AM PDT by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

I’m offended that there might be offense to it. Apparently “no speech” for some equals “free speech” for others in their tyrannical little minds.


32 posted on 03/12/2014 9:06:29 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

a cast iron one


33 posted on 03/12/2014 9:10:06 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Liberals are brainwashing the children of America!!

You read the abuses every day.

Cinco de Mayo - no American Flag shirts allowed

Kid with knife in emergency kit, locked in car - expelled.

Make a gun with your finger - suspended, put on FBI watch list.

and on and on!!

34 posted on 03/12/2014 9:20:17 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

This teacher should be fired.


35 posted on 03/12/2014 9:45:59 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore

Indeed it is.

36 posted on 03/12/2014 10:00:08 AM PDT by mc5cents (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents

Chapter 3 Liberalism Is a Sin

Liberalism, whether in the doctrinal or practical order, is a sin. In the doctrinal order, it is heresy, and consequently a mortal sin against faith. In the practical order, it is a sin against the commandments of God and of the Church, for it virtually transgresses all commandments. To be more precise: in the doctrinal order, Liberalism strikes at the very foundations of faith; it is heresy radical and universal, because WITHIN IT ARE COMPREHENDED ALL HERESIES. In the practical order it is a radical and universal infraction of the divine law, since it sanctions and authorizes all infractions of that law.

Liberalism is a heresy in the doctrinal order because heresy is the formal and obstinate denial of all Christian dogmas in general. It repudiates dogma altogether and substitutes opinion, whether that opinion be doctrinal or the negation of doctrine. Consequently, it denies every doctrine in particular. If we were to examine in detail all the doctrines or dogmas which, within the range of Liberalism, have been denied, we would find every Christian dogma in one way or another rejected—from the dogma of the Incarnation to that of Infallibility.

Nonetheless Liberalism is in itself dogmatic; and it is in the declaration of its own fundamental dogma, the absolute independence of the individual and the social reason, that it denies all Christian dogmas in general. Catholic dogma is the authoritative declaration of revealed truth—or a truth consequent upon Revelation—by its infallibly constituted exponent [the Pope]. This logically implies the obedient acceptance of the dogma on the part of the individual and of society. Liberalism refuses to acknowledge this rational obedience and denies the authority. It asserts the sovereignty of the individual and social reason and enthrones Rationalism in the seat of authority. It knows no dogma except the dogma of self-assertion. Hence it is heresy, fundamental and radical, the rebellion of the human intellect against God.

It follows, therefore, that Liberalism denies the absolute jurisdiction of Jesus Christ, who is God, over individuals and over society, and by consequence, repudiates the jurisdiction which God has delegated to the visible head of the Church over each and all of the faithful, whatever their condition or rank in life. Moreover, it denies the necessity of divine Revelation and the obligation of everyone to accept that Revelation under pain of eternal perdition. It denies the formal motive of faith, viz., the authority of God revealing, and admits only as much of revealed doctrine as it chooses or comprehends within its own narrow capacity. It denies the infallible magistracy of the Church and of the Pope, and consequently all the doctrines defined and taught by this divine authority. In short, it sets itself up as the measure and rule of faith and thus really shuts out Revelation altogether. It denies everything which it itself does not proclaim. It negates everything which it itself does not affirm. But not being able to affirm any truth beyond its own reach, it denies the possibility of any truth which it does not comprehend. The revelation of truth above human reason it therefore debars at the outset. The divinity of Jesus Christ is beyond its horoscope. The Church is outside its comprehension. The submission of human reason to the Word of Christ or its divinely constituted exponent [the Catholic Church, especially the Pope] is to it intolerable. It is, therefore, the radical and universal denial of all divine truth and Christian dogma, the primal type of all heresy, and the supreme rebellion against the authority of God and His Church. As with Lucifer, its maxim is, “I will not serve.” Such is the general negation uttered by Liberalism. From this radical denial of revealed truth in general naturally follows the denial of particular dogmas, in whole or in part (as circumstances present them in opposition to its rationalistic judgment). Thus, for instance, it denies the validity of faith by Baptism, when it admits or supposes the equality of any or all religious cults; it denies the sanctity of marriage when it sanctions so-called civil marriages; it denies the infallibility of the Roman Pontiff, when it refuses to accept as laws his official commands and teachings and subjects them to the scrutiny of its own intellect—not to assure itself of their authenticity, as is legitimate, but to sit in defiant judgment upon their contents.

When we come to the practical order, Liberalism is radical immorality. Morality requires a standard and a guide for rational action; it postulates a hierarchy of ends, and therefore of order, within whose series there is a subordination of means to the attainment of an ultimate purpose. It therefore requires a principle or fundamental rule of all action, by which the subject of moral acts, the rational creature, determines his course and guides himself to the attainment of his end. In the moral order, the Eternal Reason alone can be that principle or fundamental rule of action, and this Eternal Reason is God. In the moral order, the created reason, with power to determine its course, must guide itself by the light of the Uncreated Reason, Who is the beginning and end of all things. The law, therefore, imposed by the Eternal Reason upon the creature must be the principle or rule of morality. Hence, obedience and submission in the moral order is an absolute requisite of morality. But Liberalism has proclaimed the absurd principle of the absolute sovereignty of human reason; it denies any reason beyond itself and asserts its independence in the order of knowledge, and hence in the order of action or morality. Here we have morality without law, without order, freedom to do what one pleases, or what comes to the same thing, morality which is not morality, for morality implies the idea not only of direction, but also essentially demands that of restraint and limitation under the control of law. Liberalism in the order of action is license, recognizing no principle or rule beyond itself.

We may then say of Liberalism: in the order of ideas it is absolute error; in the order of facts it is absolute disorder. It is, therefore, in both cases a very grievous and deadly sin, for sin is rebellion against God in thought or in deed, the enthronement of the creature in the place of the Creator.


37 posted on 03/12/2014 10:07:54 AM PDT by mc5cents (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

If the teacher had said to take it off because of the no jewelry rule than that’s one thing but to take it off because it might offend someone is another thing. But, hey, because of her probably taking offense it’s making headlines around the world, tee hee.


38 posted on 03/12/2014 10:23:55 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Essex school insists wearing any wristband is against its jewellery policy H4H 'haven't heard of any health and safety incident connected to them'

Did this school have any peaceniks in the 1960s who wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War or nuclear arms as there were among American yutes?

39 posted on 03/12/2014 10:26:39 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The Texas judge's decision was to pave the way for same sex divorce for two Massachusetts women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

As I told my students back when I was teaching, they were free to do anything they wanted in my classroom... including breaking the rules... as long as they were willing to accept the consequences. Charley was being disobedient (and likely not polite about it, given the age)... but he apparently was wiling to take the consequences for his stand. That’s making a good young adult - something schools generally are not adept at doing these days.


40 posted on 03/12/2014 1:29:12 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Dem
There is functionally no difference between a rubber wrist band and a wrist watch. In fact, a watch is more dangerous because it wouldn't stretch if caught on a fixed object. The "safety" argument is pure liberal BS.

i didn't make the rules... and i didn't sign up for them by sending my child there... as a matter of fact, i would never send my children to any government school...

41 posted on 03/12/2014 6:54:31 PM PDT by latina4dubya (when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left, i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya

If it was a “I had gay sex” wristband he would be a national media star by now


42 posted on 03/12/2014 6:55:53 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
If it was a “I had gay sex” wristband he would be a national media star by now

i agree... as i said, as a conservative, i would never send my children to any government school...

43 posted on 03/12/2014 7:19:06 PM PDT by latina4dubya (when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left, i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Bump


44 posted on 03/14/2014 9:43:42 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

Britons should rise up and drive thse beasts from their land!


45 posted on 03/14/2014 10:09:58 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson