Skip to comments.
You Might Pay A Lot More Than $95 For Skipping Health Insurance
NPR ^
| 03/12/2014
| Julie Rovner
Posted on 03/12/2014 3:11:03 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: SeekAndFind
And if you have nothing, say you’re a chrity case supported by your family, your family must pay the penalty!
2
posted on
03/12/2014 3:13:11 PM PDT
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
To: SeekAndFind
I’ll pay nothing. It’s time for gobs of testicular fortitude. This is all a bluff, just like Connecticut. They don’t have the manpower, the will or the jail cells.
3
posted on
03/12/2014 3:13:11 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(I will raise $2M for Sarah Palin's next run, what will you do?)
To: SeekAndFind
4
posted on
03/12/2014 3:13:43 PM PDT
by
nascarnation
(I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
To: SeekAndFind
But I thought the Emperor changed that too... putting off the tax penalty for the individual mandate until after 2016>>>???
5
posted on
03/12/2014 3:15:21 PM PDT
by
TheBattman
(Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
To: SeekAndFind
Will this lead the sheep to shed their wool and finally stand up to the tyrrany? I hope so, but I doubt it.
6
posted on
03/12/2014 3:15:34 PM PDT
by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
To: SeekAndFind
Of course it is only subtracted from their already high EIC and other bennies that they get so why would they care. Those of us that have insurance and have to write a check every year it won’t matter.
7
posted on
03/12/2014 3:16:09 PM PDT
by
napscoordinator
( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
To: mrsmith
i. Liability for dependents Under section 5000A(b)(3)(A), if an individual with respect to whom the shared responsibility payment is imposed for a month is another individual's dependent (as defined in section 152) for the taxable year including that month, the other individual is liable for the shared responsibility payment for the dependent. The proposed regulations clarify that a taxpayer is liable for the shared responsibility payment imposed with respect to any individual for a month in a taxable year for which the taxpayer may claim a personal exemption deduction for the individual (that is, the dependent) for that taxable year. Whether the taxpayer actually claims the individual as a dependent for the taxable year does not affect the taxpayer's liability for the shared responsibility payment for the individual."
8
posted on
03/12/2014 3:22:22 PM PDT
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
To: SeekAndFind
It’s not a penalty, it’s a tax. Oh wait, it’s not a tax it’s a Shared Responsibility Fee.
9
posted on
03/12/2014 3:23:08 PM PDT
by
Eagles6
(Valley Forge Redux)
To: SeekAndFind
Remember, existing law means nothing to these liars.
Expect anything — they legislate from the Oval Office.
10
posted on
03/12/2014 3:23:44 PM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: All
11
posted on
03/12/2014 3:23:45 PM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: SeekAndFind
Too bad half the American public still has its head up its anal exit aperture, or they would be really upset and demand a change.
12
posted on
03/12/2014 3:42:07 PM PDT
by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
To: I want the USA back
Nearly 70% don’t like the law. The RINOs and DEMs get the blame.
13
posted on
03/12/2014 3:54:10 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: SeekAndFind
Good luck collecting those penalties. If you are not getting a tax refund there’s not much they can do.
14
posted on
03/12/2014 4:44:10 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: SeekAndFind
15
posted on
03/12/2014 4:44:38 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: SeekAndFind
all you got to do is fill out a form.....zap, no mandate, no penalty
16
posted on
03/12/2014 4:45:51 PM PDT
by
bert
((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
To: nascarnation
If you are willing to sign a form “under penalty of Perjury,” yes.
17
posted on
03/12/2014 5:05:22 PM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
just make sure you aren’t getting a tax refund, they will take it out of there.
18
posted on
03/12/2014 5:08:56 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: SeekAndFind
To: nascarnation
20
posted on
03/12/2014 6:07:06 PM PDT
by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson