Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Well, the Baltic states are in NATO. Personally, if I were running the show, I’d put nukes in the Baltic states; I’d also let Ukraine split, roughly along the line of the Dnieper River, and then I’d damned well see to it that the new-fangled West Ukraine not only becomes NATO, but nuclear-armed as well.

If Russia feels the need to expand, they’re welcome to do so in a southerly direction.


14 posted on 03/14/2014 7:26:16 AM PDT by AnAmericanAbroad (It's all bread and circuses for the future prey of the Morlocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: AnAmericanAbroad

I think our problem was that we expanded NATO. A NATO of 28 to 30 countries is too big to get anything done. And its sheer size is a recipe for institutional paralysis. The Russians would not mind West Ukraine becoming the 29th member. NATO is what - the military arm of the EU. Which is about as frightening to Russia as Casper the Ghost.


18 posted on 03/14/2014 7:36:51 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: AnAmericanAbroad
If Russia feels the need to expand, they’re welcome to do so in a southerly direction.

Nyet. Putin wouldn't do that to his friends.


25 posted on 03/14/2014 7:47:28 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: AnAmericanAbroad

Yes, that is what Reagan did, right? Helped arm and defend the NATO nations.


32 posted on 03/14/2014 11:43:21 AM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson