Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: varyouga
On the Malaysia Airlines flight MH370, the Boeing 777; (I've got over 26 years in USAF Air Traffic Control and 5 years with the FAA) , the ELTs never went off.
I'm of the frame of mind the the plane landed safely at a bare base under Muslim Brotherhood control.

If I were in control of the search, I'd look for the minimum distance that the Boeing 777 could land on at minimum fuel, and maybe even runways/landing strips with a distance of 500 feet less than minimum weight landing distance, and larger within the wider search range of 2,500 miles. So I'd look for runways and landing strips 5,000 ft and larger that are in Muslim Brotherhood areas and I'd start in the ...

Rush, the "Shoot Down" theory would have activated the (ELT) Emergency Locator Transmitter, and, unless within the first 5 mins of the hour Zulu time, would have been noticed.
Even within the first 5 minutes, satellites would have pinpointed a lat/long location after the 3rd sweep of the ELT.

We don't have the ELT location from the satellite system, so I don't believe it crashed or ditched into the water.
If it was blown up, the ELTs would have been activated and on battery power, they would have "transmitted pings" all the way down to the ground or if into the water all the way down through the water to the bottom.
They would transmit until the batteries run down, normally three days to a week. ELTs have survived many crashes and explosions, because they are designed to do just that.

My first thought of where to look would be any abandoned air strip left by any military in the Phillipeans.
Think of something like this.
An abandoned airfield from World War II.
My second thought is :
46 posted on 03/15/2014 12:36:55 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Yosemitest
You put alot of effort into your theory. Me? Am too simple too be imaginative. Just give me facts and then will draw a conclusion

But let me play. So in your theory, whats the purpose or motive? So far it would appear the hijacking has been a failure.

If they land at a secondary airport such as you illustrate, then what? Most likely can not fly it out due to lack of fuel and runway length? Again, what is to be gained?

Third question. You say you have time spent in the Air Force. First, thank you for your sacrifice. Now if the commander came in and said what was said at the presser. Gentlemen, we are looking for a missing aircraft. The suspected routes are . . . And he proceeds to give three diametrically opposite routes.

Am pretty sure, you and all around would look at each other, mumble snafu or fubar, shake your heads and say he does not have a clue, they are just guessing. Tell me i am wrong

61 posted on 03/15/2014 1:11:00 AM PDT by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest

Why would it go to Iran?


124 posted on 03/15/2014 7:27:20 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson