Posted on 03/16/2014 4:29:54 PM PDT by Din Maker
“Your kind”...............................LOL!!!!..............hmmmmmm, let’s see, you’ve never met me, never seen me, never talked to me, don’t know anybody I know but on the strength of one comment about someone’s attributes to win a Senate seat you start with the personal insults.
Well, I won’t join you in the insults and since you have sent me nothing about Ms Lynn to change my mind you have a nice day!
You might like to know someone else has sent me quite a lot of info on her and I will be looking at it in the next few days.
Like I said previously, I hope she turns into a STRONG candidate. But, her background on wiki is abut as weak as it could be and not what conservatives are looking for in my opinion.
Neither am I but most political advisors and historians agree that ones “personal appearance” is a factor in getting elected and can be decisive. A case in point was Kennedy/Nixon. You could fill a train up with articles written about how Nixon’s looks on TV up beside the young, handsome, dashing Kennedy was the reason Nixon lost..
Today in Texas, a very attractive (physically) woman is running for governor. Other than her good looks, few people give her much credit in the personal integrity and STRONG character department. So, she is NOT considered an “attractive” candidate OVERALL and most predict she has no chance. I agree.
Carl Levin’s old seat historically has been important because Michigan is ground zero for Union mischief, among other things.
So, the conservative movement, trying hard to win the Senate and restore this country, NEEDS the strongest possible candidate running for each seat. The question is “Is Ms Lynn that candidate?”
As of today, I see no evidence she is.
Thank you Din Maker for your intelligent response. I have already looked at some of what you sent me and wii do so more in the days to come.
And, for certain, my looks are not “senatorial candidate” quality! But then I’m not running either.
Thanks again for the info on Lynn. I’m sure all freepers agree that this senate seat she is running for is important, as are all 33 up for grabs this time around, and that we all should thoroughly evaluate ALL CANDIDATES on ALL CRITERIA so we can get to a 67 supermajority and impeach/convict this president.
Must mean they've already started printing fake ballots.
Fortunately we’ve got an aggressively anti fraud SOS and AG combined with new laws that put people in traditionally problem areas to oversee the voting and ballot counting.
As someone who has had to suffer through “Senator” Stuart Smalley for the last six years, all I can say is good for you :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.