Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Pilots Think About The Crazy New Theory That The Missing Malaysia Jet Used Another Jet To Hide
Business Insider ^ | 3-17-2014 | Alex Davies

Posted on 03/17/2014 1:37:17 PM PDT by blam

What Pilots Think About The Crazy New Theory That The Missing Malaysia Jet Used Another Jet To Hide

Alex Davies
March 17, 2014

Not surprisingly, the disappearance of Malaysia Flight 370 with 239 people on board more than a week ago has led some people to come up with very interesting theories about what might have happened.

On his Tumblr, self-identified hobby pilot and aviation enthusiast Keith Ledgerwood put forward the most elaborate and interesting suggestion we've heard yet.

He argues the 777 could have flown over India and Pakistan, avoiding military radar detection by turning off its communications systems and following a Singapore Airlines 777 so closely the two aircraft "would have shown up as one single blip on the radar."

In the post, Ledgerwood established that the Singapore Airlines flight was in the area.

The collision avoidance systems installed on all modern airliners operate using the transponder, which someone on the Malaysia flight could have turned off. So the Singapore crew wouldn't have detected a plane on their tail, Ledgerwood speculates.

"Once MH370 had cleared the volatile airspaces and was safe from being detected by military radar sites in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan," Ledgerwood writes, "it would have been free to break off from the shadow of SIA68 and could have then flown a path to it’s final landing site."

We asked Michael G. Fortune, a retired pilot who now works as an aviation consultant and expert witness, if that would be possible. After a lengthy pause, he gave us a skeptical "maybe." It would depend on what kind of radar equipment the Singapore 777 had on board, he said, and would require some serious aviation skill to find and stay behind the plane.

(snip)

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airplane; conspiracytheory; hijack; iran; malaysia; mh370; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last
To: blam

Well there was that one scene in “Air America” where they hid this plane in a barn and the bad guys (American CIA) couldn’t find it.


41 posted on 03/17/2014 2:12:03 PM PDT by SkyDancer (I Believe In The Law Until It Intereferes With Justice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ALPAPilot

With the transponder on they could track the singapore jet with TCAS up to about 30 miles. With the transponder turned off, it would not be so easy.


I’m confused here, mind you its been years since I was up on the latest technology. But the Malaysia Flight 370 could have turned off it’s transponder, thereby eliminating the primary way of tracking it.

But it in turn shouldn’t have needed it on to utilize the weather/search radar in the nose of the aircraft to find the Singapore jet and follow it.

The transponder is a separate piece of equipment from the on-board radar and the on-board radar can, (well they used to anyway), be set to receive only and not transmit. It’s the transmitter that makes them easy to track. If they needed to they could turn on the radar transmitter for a couple of sweeps and then turn it off and look at the returns on the stored memory in the cockpit instruments.

In any case I would say it was an amazing feat of flying for any pilot today who has been trained to rely on so much of the modern equipment in the planes they fly today.


42 posted on 03/17/2014 2:15:09 PM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Interesting but wouldn’t the plane be noticed by the one in front? Do commercial planes have “rear vision” video? Or would the aero be affecting the plane in front?


43 posted on 03/17/2014 2:16:05 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Robert Warren Linville

How could a 777 follow another Plane so closely without Wake Turbulence being a Factor.?

They do it all the time - it’s call landing !

Ever been to a busy airport in the evening? You can see the planes lined up one behind the other as they make their final approach with a couple of miles separation.

In this case the lead plane is traveling at assigned altitude, navigation lights/beacons working.

Then tailing plane is flying without any lights and would be very difficult to spot at this time of the morning. Tailing plane approaches from behind, stays 500 ft above the lead aircraft and maybe a mile or less behind. The tailing plane can follow the lights ahead all night.

At those distances radar might just paint a single contact, depends on how far off the military radar site is. At that time of morning it might not get much attention.


44 posted on 03/17/2014 2:19:09 PM PDT by Jambe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

I don’t know what the pilots or passengers in the lead aircraft would see. He doesn’t have to be anywhere near the same altitude, as long he is approximately the same distance from the radar antenna, give or take 500 feet.


45 posted on 03/17/2014 2:24:30 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (In the long run, we are all dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Spartan302

Aerial refueling is not possible.


46 posted on 03/17/2014 2:24:49 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man

For the 40 plus years I flew, I flew behind airborne radars for maybe 30 of those years..

I never heard of a civilian radar that could see anything other than weather, primarily because its beam is a very narrow “pencil” beam.

It mus be narrow so that the exact size and location of large storms can be seen in a manner that allows circumnavigation. A wide beam sufficient to see aircraft would paint the ground and make two cells look as though they are one, thus making it impossible to plot a course between them.

Obviously fighters have a means of intercepting aircraft, but airlines are not designed for that purpose.

Intimate knowledge of airline schedules, the TCAS and carefully monitoring center frequencies during the planning period would have been his best means.


47 posted on 03/17/2014 2:26:03 PM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CFIIIMEIATP737

Stepped down and in tight would work, as well. Like aerial refueling. Stepped up would make it hard to see the aircraft you are flying form on.


48 posted on 03/17/2014 2:26:14 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: blam

Except once you’re over land, all the passengers’ cell phones would have worked again.


49 posted on 03/17/2014 2:28:06 PM PDT by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jambe

I am a Pilot as well, I’ve never seen planes follow that closely, even at Lax there’s plenty of seperation.

Remember the La Guardia Aircraft Crash that ended up in a neighborhood for taking off to quickly after another planes Wake. An Airbus I think.


50 posted on 03/17/2014 2:30:29 PM PDT by Robert Warren Linville (So proud of Free Republic that I use my real name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

Thanks for the information. The last radar I worked on was a shipboard one and it was switchable for different conditions depending on the surroundings. One setting was good for weather while out on the ‘bounty blue’ a different one was good for inshore navigation but filtered out Weather returns etc. I just assumed that the commercial ones would be somewhat similar despite having a side to side sweep versus a rotating sweep.

That assumption thing can really ‘bite’ you ya’know?

I did get an introductory course on the radar for the helicopters we occasionally carried and they had some very impressive capabilities. But being military that’s to be expected.


51 posted on 03/17/2014 2:33:08 PM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: C210N

None of it seems to take into account the fact that the plane climbed first to 47,000, then rapidly descended. Or the cell phones, that, over land, would have been at some point operable.


52 posted on 03/17/2014 2:36:18 PM PDT by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Robert Warren Linville
How could a 777 follow another Plane so closely without Wake Turbulence being a Factor.?

Wake turbulence is a "thing" that trails an aircraft, and descends. If they had the same "footprint", the lower a/c would not see the WT - it would descend behind it. Besides, WT to two jumbo's is a flea in the wind... it is a BIG problem for C210's, however.

53 posted on 03/17/2014 2:39:21 PM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: blam
Flying With Fish ‏@flyingwithfish 7h From DHS Source, “Verified intel still supports that no evidence exists that #MH370 crashed just the opposite. The plane is hidden by now”

Flying With Fish ‏@flyingwithfish 7h From a DHS source, “based on a current intel briefing I feel confident saying we have a 75% chance of not finding a trace of #MH370””

Flying With Fish ‏@flyingwithfish 9h @PartRhymer My #MH370 tweets may be far slower than usual today, all of my sources have gone dead silent, which indicates something is afoot
54 posted on 03/17/2014 2:42:24 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

well, it started out to be 45,000.

What was the original source of that information?

What radar facility in that area had the capability of reading altitude with the transponder turned off?

Cell phones are not usable at high altitudes because they hit so many cell towers that they drive the system nuts.


55 posted on 03/17/2014 2:42:34 PM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Robert Warren Linville
How to picture WT...


56 posted on 03/17/2014 2:43:00 PM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: crosslink; maggief

Everyone is assuming that its a normal 777. What were the patent holders able to contribute to the mix from their laptops?
Other than a reason to ditch the plane where black boxes can’t be found


57 posted on 03/17/2014 2:43:15 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: C210N

And the Airbus that crashed out of LGA Years ago was Flea Hit when it took off shortly after another did.


58 posted on 03/17/2014 2:44:29 PM PDT by Robert Warren Linville (So proud of Free Republic that I use my real name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Flying With Fish ‏@flyingwithfish 9h Typically when multiple sources all go dead quiet at once it means either something is about to happen ... or they think something is.

Flying With Fish ‏@flyingwithfish 15h Interesting China had specific guidelines in what media could say & report on #MH370 on March 8 with all the misinformation they put out.

Flying With Fish ‏@flyingwithfish 16h From Chinese gov’t to media on March 8 - “The media may not independently analyze or comment on the lost Malaysia Airlines flight.” #MH370
59 posted on 03/17/2014 2:44:51 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: blam

Well hopefully India can go back and check the radar transmissions of that Singapore flight that night a little more closely to see if there might have been something in its shadow.


60 posted on 03/17/2014 2:45:12 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson