[SoFloFreeper]

Wasn't Connecticut the state where children were MURDERED in cold blood because of the evil heart of a wicked man? Weren't we told in the aftermath of that sickening event that children needed to be protected?

Looks like some children in Connecticut are NOT protected...no freedom of speech, no freedom of religion, and not a scintilla of freedom of choice in education.

Nice move, Connecticut...you guys are real progressive.

[Telepathic Intruder]

Of course the Constitution allows free speech, but only in the case where a topic is not too controversial.

[free-in-nyc]

Apparently children only need to be protected when it advances the leftist agenda.

[GeronL]

You can bet that gay sex among the under aged is not too controversial to push in the curriculum though

[bgill]

Has he also banned sex education class and passing out free condoms?

[polymuser]

“He (principal) tells us that this topic in particular is too controversial to be talked about in public school,” she explained to WWLP.”

OK. Then no more talk about GLBTQ, birth control, abortion, evolution, Islam or, gun control in that school.