Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Democrats' choice: Repeal ObamaCare or impeach Obama
OneNewsNow ^ | March 12, 2014 | Bryan Fischer

Posted on 03/17/2014 7:55:40 PM PDT by kingattax

Time to pick your poison, Democrats. Patch the boat by dumping ObamaCare and Obama - or ride this puppy to the bottom of the ocean. It's your choice.

According to the Wall Street Journal, President Obama's brigade of buffoons running his signature healthcare bill has waived the penalty for not buying health insurance.

Yes, you read that right. The individual mandate, which we were told by Obama was the key to making the whole thing work, has been dropped out of ObamaCare until 2016.

The decision "has received zero media notice," and was buried in a paragraph and footnote in a seven-page technical bulletin which is about something else altogether. This guilty furtiveness is understandable since all along we've been told that the individual mandate is the indispensable, non-negotiable lynchpin of the whole deal.

In essence, we were told that without the boot-on-the-neck force of the United States government, the thing wouldn't work at all.

John Roberts, who rewrote this misbegotten bill from the bench to call the mandate a "tax" instead of a "penalty," was apparently unavailable for comment on this latest development.

Roberts sacrificed his judicial integrity, his legal reputation and his legacy to give Obama his law by shredding the Constitution, and now Obama has told him in effect he did it all for nothing. -

(Excerpt) Read more at onenewsnow.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
screw john roberts and his legacy. damn chicken-livered traitor.
1 posted on 03/17/2014 7:55:41 PM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Obama is here to screw up America so bad, she can never recover.


2 posted on 03/17/2014 7:58:21 PM PDT by mfish13 (Elections have Consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

No. The Democrats choice is to continue building evil coalitions for power politics to usurp illegal authority and build a tyranny.


3 posted on 03/17/2014 7:59:07 PM PDT by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I’m all in for both!

LET US REPEAL OBAMACARE AND IMPEACH THE SLIMY SONOFABITCH!


4 posted on 03/17/2014 7:59:57 PM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Judge Johnny tortured the Constitution to get his ObamaCare opinion.


5 posted on 03/17/2014 8:01:36 PM PDT by Amagi (Lenin: "Socialized Medicine is the Keystone to the Arch of the Socialist State.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mfish13

And he has done an excellent job of it. It will take generations to sort of recover. The illegal alien from Kenya needs hanging, with all of his marxist buddies, holder, and then all of the muslim brothers in his administration, as well as the ex sec state.


6 posted on 03/17/2014 8:08:10 PM PDT by matthew fuller (No, I don't miss GWB- I miss Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingattax; All

“Bully Obama double-dog dares cowardly House RINOs to Impeach him.”

____________________________

Removal from Office by the US Senate can ONLY be accomplished AFTER a Chief Executive is Impeached by the US House of Representatives.

The House is analogous to the Police, and the Senate is analogous the Judge and Jury.

First the House must Impeach Obama.

Then the Senate determines if the Impeached Obama should be removed from office.

Most FReepers fall in the all or nothing camp, and only want to consider a clear path to Removal from Office.

Our Constitution makes it very clear: Impeach first by the House, and then have the Senate decide on Removal.

The objective is to punish Obama for his many violations of his sacred oath to defend the US Constitution.

Although bi-weekly Impeachments for at least a year of B. Hussein Obama would be required to punish him for all of his Constitutional violations over the last 5 years, just one Impeachment is an achievable goal in the summer of 2014.

Obama’s Removal from Office by the US Senate would be good for America, but unlikely before 2015 as Reid’s US Senate has not yet demonstrated any interest in what is good for America.

Since the RINOs now have control of the US House of Representatives in 2014, then 2014 is the last year that we can be certain that Obama could be Impeached.

The RINOs assume that they will maintain control of the US House, but their usual desire to lose to Democrats is so strong, that their assumption may not be a valid one.

Thus, a reasonable plan to Remove Obama from Office would be to Impeach Obama in the Summer of 2014, hold that Impeachment during the Autumn Election Campaign, and then send the completed Impeachment of Obama to the US Senate in 2015 one week after the newly elected Republican Senators are sworn in.

The Republicans would then have a clear National Voter Referendum on what the voter loyalty is towards Obama and his past Five Year Plan:

“IF YOU DON’T LIKE WHAT OBAMA HAS DONE IN THE LAST 5 YEARS TO “FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,” THEN VOTE FOR YOUR REPUBLICAN SENATOR AND HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE.”

As Speaker Newt Gingrich proved to us with his “Contract With America:” Republicans win when they actively campaign on the basic Republican truth that “All Politics are National.”

Thus, the 2014 Republican Candidates for House and Senate would have the assured Removal from Office of Obama as another excellent reason to vote a straight Republican ticket, in addition to the other Campaign issues such as Obamacare, Benghazi, IRS, NSA, and all of the other Obama Scandals.

Hopefully, the Democrats and the Left Stream Media will accuse the RINOs of “using the blame game by playing politics to use the Obama “phony” scandals as a political football to quiet their extremist TEA Party base by trying to Impeach the first Nobel Peace Prize wining Commander in Chief.”

Come to think of it, their comments are EXACTLY what our Founding Fathers would have expected from supporters of those who are undergoing Constitutional Checks and Balances.

______________________

Speaker Boehner has proven himself to be incapable of protecting the US Constitution from a Lawless Chief Executive.

Speaker Boehner tried and failed, convincingly.

Boehner must resign as Speaker of the House by April 15, 2014.

Trey Gowdy, (or another strong Republican), should be the new Speaker, and then Obama could be easily Impeached in the American Summer of 2014 while the RINOs still have control of the House, and the elections are not yet completed.

Make 2014 the “Summer of Constitutional Checks and Balances.”

Impeach Soetoro-Obama in the Summer of 2014, PERIOD.


7 posted on 03/17/2014 8:08:38 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
screw john roberts and his legacy. damn chicken-livered traitor.

Not exactly but you're close to being on the right track. My own theory is that the dems have pictures of Roberts doing it with a chicken...

8 posted on 03/17/2014 8:11:02 PM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Dems should no longer be allowed a choice in any political situation or manner. Vote every single one of them OUT, on every level!


9 posted on 03/17/2014 8:12:43 PM PDT by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
When you come to a fork in the road

TAKE IT!!!

10 posted on 03/17/2014 8:13:59 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Choice? Can’t they do both???


11 posted on 03/17/2014 8:14:05 PM PDT by null and void ( Obama is Law-Less because Republican "leaders" are BALL-LESS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Traitor Robert’s legacy is to have most Americans viewing SCOTUS decisions to be moot.


12 posted on 03/17/2014 8:17:29 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Don’t, just yet, sell Roberts short over his Obama Care decision.

Democrats never intended for Obama Care to work. They knew they were incapable of running anything that large, and they knew Republicans were aware of their incompetence. Democrats were sure Republicans would stop them, thus relieving them of the responsibility of running something they were incapable of running in the first place but leaving them with the issue. What they didn’t realize was that Republicans have become just as incompetent as are Democrats.

Never forget that Democrats are Communists and Communists are ends justify the means liars. Democrats are masters of the lie, the double deal, the scam, the hustle, the rigged election, and any trick they can use to stay in power, but they aren’t capable of running a legitimate business enterprise such as our country’s health care system and they know it.

When Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Barry Soetoro passed Obama Care, they knew it was not only unworkable but it was unconstitutional and the Supreme Court would stop it, leaving the Democrats with the issue (“We tried to provide every American with affordable health care, and the mean old Republicans stopped us”). In the meantime, the Democrats rewarded loyal Democrats with over a billion dollars (exact amount as yet unknown) in contracts for a website that was never intended to come to fruition. They certainly didn’t expect John Roberts’ Supreme Court to leave them with the responsibility and not the issue.

This Republican halted health care issue was the one the Democrats intended to use to rally their base for the 2012 election and without it had to use the Trayvon Martin shooting instead. “If I had a son,” and a few rigged elections barely pulled it off for them in 2012, but they were also counting on the ACA issue for 2014 and 2016, so now what are they going to use to rally their base? Not to worry, they’ll come up with something that’ll infuriate their “low information” electorate.

No, John Roberts didn’t do the Democrats a favor when he didn’t give them an “issue” but instead gave them the responsibility for doing something they were incapable of ever doing and never intended to do in the first place.

But what do I know? I’m just a tax payer.


13 posted on 03/17/2014 8:21:40 PM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war,and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matthew fuller

BO and his minions need to be investigated and prosecuted if any law breaking is found. It’s BS what they have gotten away with.


14 posted on 03/17/2014 8:23:16 PM PDT by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

The song, “Who Do You Love?”
by George Thorogood and the Destroyers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5Aabx80gV4


15 posted on 03/17/2014 8:23:55 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

“Although bi-weekly Impeachments for at least a year of B. Hussein Obama would be required ...”

Not seeing an issue. If he warrants them, and he does, it is the job of Bhoner and Co to do it. As many as needed. Daily if it comes to it. Hourly in rotation.

The senate can do what it wants. But the job of The house does not have a clause for electorial concerns’ or ‘party well being’.


16 posted on 03/17/2014 8:24:02 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: varmintman

Yep, BO has something big on Roberts. No doubt in my mind at all.


17 posted on 03/17/2014 8:24:24 PM PDT by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

” - - - Not seeing an issue. - - - “

Neither does, doormat RINOs Boehner, Cantor or Ryan.


18 posted on 03/17/2014 8:27:43 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: matthew fuller
Obama wants a legacy.

He wants to single-handedly bring down The Great Satan and have his praises sung in every mosque for thousands of years.

19 posted on 03/17/2014 8:28:09 PM PDT by null and void ( Obama is Law-Less because Republican "leaders" are BALL-LESS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

According to bill O’reilly tonight “it’s over, Obamacare is done”. This, on account of the “hardship provision” which means anyone who wants to say “it’s too hard” to get Obamacare isn’t going to be penalized.

Maybe valid, maybe not, but the truth is, the more Democrats run from it, the more extensions are given, the weaker the law becomes. They have another set of choices:

Enforce Obamacare or allow it to fall into disarray, unenforceable and ignored.


20 posted on 03/17/2014 8:29:17 PM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson