Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: redleghunter; lepton
A pre-existing heart condition should have no bearing on treating someone for cancer. Unless the said treatments would cause his heart to fail. We have no indication of this.

I agree, Redleghunter.

My father was in a position where oncologists refused chemo because they thought the chemo would hurt him more. The insurance company didn't refuse to pay for chemo; the doctors were making that decision.

If the pastor had a heart condition that could be worsened with chemo, an oncologist might decide not to treat him. He's receiving chemo, so his oncologist must have no objection to him receiving it. So, why would the insurance company object?

It really sounds as if, like I think you suggested earlier, his insurance plan through the church just was not a very good one. Hopefully people will help this pastor, run a fundraiser, etc., to help him pay off that big bill. Then he can focus on just getting well.

66 posted on 03/19/2014 9:13:58 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Tired of Taxes

A potential solution the “old fashioned way”:

http://mychristiancare.org/medi-share/


67 posted on 03/19/2014 9:34:33 PM PDT by redleghunter (Jesus said: "it is written...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson