Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Democratic Civil War Over Energy
The Wall Street Journal ^ | March 20,2014 | Kimberley Strassel

Posted on 03/22/2014 7:31:30 AM PDT by Hojczyk

The environmental left is seeing Democrats the Keystone XL pipeline, and raising them natural-gas exports. The question of who folds on this issue will play big in this midterm election year.

A split is growing in the Democratic Party, one that ought to rival the divisions on the right that the headlines trumpet. Greens are increasingly bitter about President Obama —annoyed that he's dropped climate legislation, scaled back green subsidies, ignored fracking. They've channeled their frustration into the fight against Keystone, warning that they'll turn their significant money and resources against Mr. Obama's party if the president approves more "dirty oil." Since this president cares about nothing so much as winning elections, he's sat on the pipeline for five years.

Red-state senate Democrats like Mary Landrieu (La.) and Mark Pryor (Ark.) are these days fighting for pro-energy airtime with colleagues like Colorado's Mark Udall. Mr. Udall, who can usually be found pushing a federal renewable energy mandate, now finds himself facing a likely challenge from Rep. Cory Gardner —as pro-energy a Republican as they come. When the Ukraine crisis began, Mr. Udall suddenly couldn't move quickly enough to introduce a bill to expand the number of countries to which the U.S. can export natural gas. A Udall spokesman publicly bragged that they'd got their own bill introduced before Mr. Gardner introduced his own.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 03/22/2014 7:31:30 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

> Greens are increasingly bitter about President Obama ...,
> warning that they’ll turn their significant money and
> resources against Mr. Obama’s party if the president
> approves more “dirty oil.”

Dear Greenies,
Oh, please do turn your “significant money and resources” to the Green Party. Ralph Nader for president!!! Yes that’s it!! Give all your money to him!


2 posted on 03/22/2014 7:37:36 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
warning that they'll turn their significant money and resources against Mr. Obama's party if the president approves more "dirty oil."

LOL!

That's like saying our local Putinistas will turn against Putin if he withdraws from Crimea.

Never gonna happen.

3 posted on 03/22/2014 7:48:10 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

Ping!


4 posted on 03/22/2014 7:52:10 AM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

CW-II is not that far away.


5 posted on 03/22/2014 7:55:39 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Nothing democratic about the “Democratic” civil war on energy.

Goose-steppers one and all, marching in the largest and heaviest boots they can find.

IMHO


6 posted on 03/22/2014 7:57:01 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

It’ll take awhile but unleashing capitalism on Putin will turn him into Kaputin. Not to be confused with Rasputin. Russia is planning on building a pipeline to China. That will start operating about the same time we’ll have the ability via the Sabine Pass facility to ship LNG to Europe. We also will have the ability to ship LNG to China about that time.

We’re in a race.


7 posted on 03/22/2014 8:01:58 AM PDT by meatloaf (Impeach Obama. That's my New Year's resolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“..Emboldened, the eco-warriors are now dramatically upping the stakes,..” has given Putin the perfect opening to introduce his fossil fuel initiative in which he will try to control the EU and US like puppets on strings by raising and lowering prices - none of which will come out in favor of the US. The “greens” will do us in if we do not counter.


8 posted on 03/22/2014 8:05:45 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

and as we ship large quantities of natural gas to Europe what will happen to availability and prices of natural gas in the US??

Besides I don’t see the US being able to replace the huge amount of LNG going from Russia to Europe now.


9 posted on 03/22/2014 8:10:07 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

It doesn’t have to replace it all. Europe pays 3x the going rate in the US for natural gas. Even with conversion and the cost of shipping we’ll severely cramp Russia’s ability to extort Europe.

The low price is inhibiting drilling by preventing drilling in areas of dry gas, methane, but forcing drillers to move to areas with wet gas (methane along with propane, butane, pentane and ethane). The liquids are the real profit now. Exporting gas will relieve some of the pressure from the over supply of natural gas in this country.

Lots of wells that have been drilled are not being produced because the collection pipelines have not been completed. That means we have much more natural gas already tapped but not being produced in addition to the over supply of gas.

Exporting gas will unleash more drilling and production. The natural gas industry has been doing the drill baby drill thing before that became a mantra. The oil produced as a by product of the gas wells is behind our progress towards energy independence.


10 posted on 03/22/2014 8:22:16 AM PDT by meatloaf (Impeach Obama. That's my New Year's resolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

Having the Democrats in a fight with the environmental left over energy policy is a sure fire winner for the GOP in 2014, and almost ensures a well funded liberal challenge to HRC in 2016.


11 posted on 03/22/2014 8:27:06 AM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

I actually worked with a crazy liberal who said we had too much technology and should be living in caves again.


12 posted on 03/22/2014 9:14:12 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Luke21

Where did he live. Tell him he could use himself as an example to the rest of us. That would effectively remove him from the gene pool. LOL


13 posted on 03/22/2014 10:28:56 AM PDT by snowtigger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Landreau, Pryor, Udall, & other vulnerable Rats can make all the pro-energy pronouncements they can possible utter, yet if their reelection leaves Reid as majority leader, he will never allow common sense energy bills to the floor for a vote.

A vote against the Rats is a vote against Reid. A vote against Reid is a vote to stop the unqualified, radical Obama appointments.

14 posted on 03/22/2014 11:38:20 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson