The Jews seem to exert the same anti-semite rhetoric that the blacks, hispanics, muslims, chinese, do whenever anyone writes or says anything negative about them. Whether it is actual fact or merely an observation and/or inferences of coincidence.
If one cannot discuss jews collectively any more than one cannot discuss blacks, hispanics, or homosexuals without being addressed as a racist, anti-semite, islamophobe, homophobe, etc. then we have lost the ability to speak freely and think clearly.
You don’t have to agree with their assessments, if they are an assessment not a suggestion to kill a specific ethnicity for being ethnic.
The left/communists certainly have no compunction about suggesting that anyone who disagrees with them should be killed for just thinking differently than them.
I don’t always agree with everything I read from Daniel Greenfield either but he is still a vary smart guy, and a gifted writer. I adamantly disagree with almost everything that Thomas Friedman or Paul Krugman writes or thinks...does that make me an anti-semite?
Buchanan is a smart guy, he offers his insights and views for your consideration, not your approval. Take what he writes for what it’s worth. He may very well be wrong on a particular topic but to ostracize him because you disagree with him on a particular subject should not make him a pariah...just wrong. Do we not have the liberty to be wrong about a particular subject?
I don’t listen to Jew-haters ... no matter what they say.