It's framed in terms of "rights." This woman (quoted in another article) said she'd vote as many times as she could to protect the "right" of BO "to be seated as President." Her right to vote as many times as she wanted, BO's right to have access to the office of POTUS if he wanted. Once the argument is framed in terms of rights and reparations, what sort of reasoning can you use to combat that?
Here is my new scheme for allowing for multiple voting.
From now on, based on the latest actuarial tables (sort of...), assuming a voting life of 60 years after age 18, give each person a lifetime number of presidential votes of 15 60 years divided by presidential elections every 4 years), to be spent anyway they wish. If they want, they can vote 15 times for Obama and then never vote again for the rest of their lives. Or, they can vote once every 4 years.
Of course, they would be able to cheat this system just like they do now...
-PJ
Of course, there is no argument or reasoning with magical thinking.
Just because some Chicago light-in-the-loafers thug who never worked a day in his life happens to be **black, he has an historic claim to the
presidency and to dismantling, destroying, and distributing our wealth to the rest of the planet from best country in the history of the world.
And just where will the elites go when there is no USA to which to flee when the rabble take over other countries and turn them into hell holes?
**He’s 2% black, and the rest is white and Arab.