Posted on 03/23/2014 11:37:16 AM PDT by Kaslin
I didn’t know that about Colorado limiting the spending. I wonder if such a vote would pass now? And why isn’t this more publicized....I know ..rhetorical question.
Pretty dang shocking that these people would have the nerve to attempt this lawsuit. It boggles the mind.
Sure they do but not in a Federal court. This is a STATE court problem. Considering that it is a duly passed amendment to their constitution I dont see these weasels having a case (no offense to any real weasels out there, I do respect your varmint hunting abilities)
Each STATE is a sovereign STATE. The STATES have the right to set up their own government provided that the state has a REPUBLICAN form of government (Article 4)
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence
Other than that the courts and the Federal Government need to stay out of it.
If you have a constitutional limit on taxing and a constitutional requirement to a balanced budget you have to limit spending to the constraints of the revenue available.
Colorado Ping ( Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)
Sheesh
This means that they cannot spend money from anyone not represented. If you are not represented, you are not getting this "guaranteed" Republcan form of government. Those who are not yet born cannot possibly be represented so debt cannot be passed unto them. Spending their money before they can have a voice on representation denies them of this "guarantee".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.