Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sarah Barracuda

Nate isn’t taking into consideration the MASSIVE and I mean MASSIVE voter fraud the left will do in November
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Well, I’m new to FR, but, most political websites give some credence to what you said above. However, no one has ever produced proof that there is “MASSIVE” voter fraud. If you have proof; lay it on us. I mean, old man, Mayor Daley of Chicago, has been dead a long time.


20 posted on 03/23/2014 2:59:26 PM PDT by Din Maker (Rand Paul, Rick Perry endorse Mitch McConnell over Bevin. Neither will ever get my vote in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Din Maker
I mean, old man, Mayor Daley of Chicago, has been dead a long time.

And he is still voting Democrat

23 posted on 03/23/2014 3:01:49 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Din Maker

There’s the woman in Ohio who was let go even after she confessed to voting 8 times for Obama..EIGHT..and the left adores her..of course there is going to be fraud in November, there always is, that is why Dems are so against Voter ID


27 posted on 03/23/2014 3:04:10 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Din Maker
Well, I’m new to FR, but, most political websites give some credence to what you said above. However, no one has ever produced proof that there is “MASSIVE” voter fraud. If you have proof; lay it on us.

As you note, the direct evidence is scarce... but with good reason. The Left, the MSM, the Dem machine, etc all have a heavily vested-interest in keeping it a secret. Literally trillions of dollars are on the line.

However, the anecdotal evidence is pretty massive on its own:
EVERY effort to clean up voter rolls: opposed by Dems
EVERY effort to ensure that only US citizens vote: opposed by Dems
EVERY time the number of votes in a district exceeds the actual number of registered voters (ie, a 100+% turnout): it is ALWAYS in a 90+% Dem district (and these are usually areas where you can't get a 10% turnout for free smoke-detectors).
EVERY time an election is close, the heavily Dem districts get reported last, and are almost always sufficient to turn the result into a Dem win, even if 90% of the other districts and counties vote GOP.

"It ain't rocket surgery"

30 posted on 03/23/2014 3:11:56 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson