[eyeamok]

If corporations can object on religious grounds to providing contraception coverage, could they also object to vaccinations or blood transfusions?

How in the Hell does one equate a Voluntary Act with that of Medical Necessity??

She really is an IDIOT!!

[mbarker12474]

> If corporations can object on religious grounds to providing contraception coverage, could they also object to vaccinations or blood transfusions?....

Of course they could and should be able to object to vaccinations or transfusions. Or bandages or chemotherapy or the setting of broken limbs. Or asprin or antibiotics or cold medicine.

Whether it’s for reasons religious, economic or for whim.

Or voluntary act or medical necessity.

[Lurking Libertarian]

If corporations can object on religious grounds to providing contraception coverage, could they also object to vaccinations or blood transfusions? How in the Hell does one equate a Voluntary Act with that of Medical Necessity?? She really is an IDIOT!!

There are religions that oppose vaccination (Christian Scientists) and blood transfusions (Jehovah's Witnesses). Her question is a valid one: if the owners of a corporation can refuse to provide insurance for things that their religion opposes, where should the Court draw the line?