He said it’s assinine that 9 men appointed and approved by the elite can sit in judgement of 200,000,000 people...or whatever the population was at the time. It appears to me he was seeing the judge as being activists.
Not sure whether he was referring to their legitimate Constitutional role or their judicial “activism” outside their legitimate Constitutional role. I think his case went before SCOTUS but I’m not sure. Either way Mason was a wacko but had (has?) a high IQ as I recall.