Judge Sandra Ikuta said San Francisco residents were free to buy the banned bullets outside city limits.
1 posted on
03/26/2014 9:05:21 AM PDT by
aimhigh
To: aimhigh
Though the supreme court stopped this with the DC decision.
2 posted on
03/26/2014 9:07:31 AM PDT by
edcoil
(Not a single republican was ever a slave owner. They were all democrats.)
To: aimhigh
I am still at a loss over any gun law. Is the 2nd amendment not clear enough?
To: aimhigh
San Francisco requires handgun owners to secure weapons in their homes by storing them in a locker, keeping them on their bodies or applying trigger locks. HA! The entire state of Massachusetts is under this law since 1994. Thanks so much Mitt Romney. Can't wait to leave this hell hole.
6 posted on
03/26/2014 9:28:25 AM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Truth sounds like hate...to those who hate truth.)
To: aimhigh
These idiots just put the public in danger by banning hollow point bulletts.If a person has to fire on a bad guy,most hard ball rounds will over penatrate and strike an innocent civilian immediately behind the perp.
Hollow points prevent that from occurring by expanding on impact and taking out only the bad guy.
Thank God I don’t live in San Francisco.
7 posted on
03/26/2014 9:44:09 AM PDT by
puppypusher
( The World is going to the dogs.)
To: aimhigh
Now THAT’s the kind of reasoning I expect from the 9th.
Peruta was just a glimmer of sanity coming from those clowns
8 posted on
03/26/2014 10:23:53 AM PDT by
Cyman
(We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
To: aimhigh
That city would burn to the ground before I would go and take a whiz on the fire.
Far as I'm concerned, people who live in San Fran deserve the loss of their rights, because they probably voted to take someone else's.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson