Posted on 04/01/2014 7:47:26 PM PDT by Mount Athos
Not to mention the Moose took 70 of her closest friends on this taxpayer funded abortiorama.
LOL ... good one ... “National Enquirer”.
Do you have any “Flying Saucers landed on White House Lawn” ? ... :-) ...
Somehow, I doubt he cared a bit about the cost of her trip. This is BS.
The Mooch is EXACTLY as Freepers have depicted her for years! A parasite of the lowest order.
I don’t understand why he would care.
People scoff at the Enquierer, but aside from Drudge and FR, for MONTHS they were the only one that would touch the Monica story with a 10-foot pole.
They kept it up, too.
My very deep scorn changed, then, and I scorn them considerably less than the MSM, or maybe even Russian sources.
Barack doesn't care about this stuff at all.
Well, although the press ignores it, the Clintons have no interest in seeing each other. But they aren’t about to get a divorce, because that would throw a spoke in their wheels.
Same with the Obamas. They aren’t about to get divorced, when it would put a spoke in their extravagant spending and their press adulation, and maybe even raise a few questions about their sexual orientations.
I’m sure they’re both mad as hell at each other, but they’re not about to do anything that would interfere with their self gratification.
Divorce? No.
Saw the National Enquirer at the store today, cover story, also a story on Ellen Degeneres “the Queen of Mean” I think it said.
Don’t forget they exposed John Edward’s affair months before the MSM would touch it.
I trust them more than the newspapers.
That’s the weekly world news!
“Divorce? No.”
______________________________________
I agree. Divorce maybe if and when he leaves office.
I don’t buy this for a second. If there’s one thing they absolutely agree on, it’s spending other peoples’ money.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_asaGZBnQIQA/TAzBa_A1t2I/AAAAAAAAAi0/C-5ifwnP5Iw/s1600/100_0085.JPG
Not everything Weekly World News published is wrong.
Me too!
Apparently she is nearly as popular as “Ellen” and “Oprah” with the American sheeple.
You’d think the “first black president” wouldn’t perpetuate the stereotype of blacks on the dole.
Of course he’s only the 2nd black president because all the “black leaders” in 1992 told me Clinton was the first.
And Barack is only half black. So after the first woman (Hillary who’s crowning was supposed to be in 2008) do we go for a full black gay whatever next?
My bingo card is getting confusing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
