Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: driftdiver

You mean like all those bases in Iraq and Afghanistan where they are required to be armed............................................... Are we comparing an active war zone to a stateside base?? We have armed personnel on the base, they are called MPs. Its interesting to note that when there is any kind of a shooting on the base, the local “Police” arrive. Increase armed MP presence would be more appropriate. BTW, seen many knife fight victims as a 67H, they just don’t have the impact effect to be used by the MSM. They are out there but not news worthy.


12 posted on 04/03/2014 7:26:16 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (2016 an election or a coronation of a Queen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Bringbackthedraft

There are thousands of civilian government employees, contractors and military spouses on Fort Hood - As a very first step, I think all of these people should be allowed to carry on post as long as they are permitted by state law to carry off post. I would also permit all off-duty soldiers to carry and I would leave the issue of carrying on duty to the discretion of commanders. That is just my humble ex-Army opinion!


16 posted on 04/03/2014 7:45:29 AM PDT by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Bringbackthedraft

Yeah those gun free zones are soo effective at reducing shootings. /s


23 posted on 04/03/2014 8:44:46 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson