FURP!! Amnesty pushers need not apply!!
“S.E. Cupp(s) huh, I’m ONLY here for the PICS!
Its good that these “donors” are becoming more public and their agenda is being understood by more people. The Republican Party will need more sophisticated and informed primary voters or the mistakes of 2008 and 2012 will be repeated. The country absolutely needs an effective, credible Republican in 2016.
No longer interested in the GOP. They’ve given up on Liberty.
We need Rand Paul because letting foreign rapists, drug dealers, murderers, drunk drivers, embezzlers, criminals, and grifters of every kind come and go in the United States and do whatever they please with no possibility of just maintaining our borders is some sort of plus.
Hell with him, and all of his supporters.
He does not support the military lobby?
He would cave on abortion and queer marriage too.
The entire libtardian theory of governance can be summed up as...
“First we smoke some dope...magic happens...and our other ideas work out fine.”
No - won’t vote for him
I can’t support a pro-homosexual, open borders, weak military libertarian. I don’t understand why my elected leaders can’t represent me. My views are still mainstream:
1) Homosexuality: should be tolerated, i.e. legal, but shouldn’t be treated as though it’s the same thing as a heterosexual union, because it’s not.
2) Illegal immigration: we need to enforce existing laws. Illegal aliens take jobs from American citizens and load down our social welfare system. We don’t need to subsidize rich business owners by paying to take care of their illegal alien workers.
3) Military: We need to have the strongest military bar none. That doesn’t mean we need to meddle in other nations all over the world, i.e. act as the world’s police force. We do need to be able to deal with any threats to the USA itself.
Call me a purist, but I can’t vote for anyone who wants to push homosexual marriage, amnesty the illegals, or weaken our military.
He froze himself out. He isn’t even a choice for me. He is out
because of his on politics.
Just ask him views on leaglizing heroin.
Losing seems to be something a lot of Republicans are now used to. What have the GOP-E offered the public the last 2x out? They've offered up retreads who push Democrat "Lite" (all the regulation, half the price!).
At best, Republicans within the last century have offered a holding action against government growth. None have actually succeeded in reducing the scope of the Federal bureaucracy.
The country has drifted ever further to the event horizon of an irredeemable, all-powerful State; one from which the only escape will be the self-destruction of the government as it collapses under its own gravity.
Could the country return to a true Federation of States; where the Federal government has very little actual power and power rests with each State? In theory, it could, but perhaps we've already passed the Nanny State event horizon with a plurality of the population now receiving some sort of dole and therefor beholden to the almighty State.
We're likely following the same path as Ancient Rome. All Hail, Emperor Hillary!
That's what the GOP movers and shakers say about anybody who believes we could actually shrink the size and influence of the Federal government.
They tell us they'll run our lives differently than the Democrats. I want a government that doesn't run my life at all.
Paul is coming out as a liberal on far more than just foreign policy, and national defense.
his positions on amnesty and sociial issues make him unelectable