Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

Thomas’ written opinions are also the tightest and most solid. No sophistry or flowery prose for Clarance, just straight up legal analysis. Issue, law, application and conclusion.


6 posted on 04/04/2014 4:30:30 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: circlecity

Pray for Justice Thomas.


7 posted on 04/04/2014 4:37:18 AM PDT by Machavelli (True God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: circlecity

Yes. Even where there is disagreement on what the ruling should be, you at least know where the line is...what actions you might take that would comply with the ruling, and which would not.

Sandra Day O’Connor was legendary for the unnecessary vagueness, blurry lines, and double talk in her rulings. Some of the current judges follow suit.


11 posted on 04/04/2014 4:46:30 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson