The fink Chris Christie could have appointed a Republican to that Senate seat but instead opted for a special election in which the Corporate Media crowned the phony Booker. Christie didn’t want anything to interfere with his own reelection.
“The fink Chris Christie could have appointed a Republican to that Senate seat but instead opted for a special election in which the Corporate Media crowned the phony Booker.”
My understanding at the time was that it was standard practice to appoint someone from the party of the missing senator to fill out the term (as the “will of the voters”); is that not true?