Thank Heaven for the moral compass of the Johnson clan...</sarc>
The 2 percenters can only increase their ranks if they can force YOU to promote and endorse their deviant behavior.
The behavior IS “deviant” as confirmed by:
1) The plumbing doesn’t work,
2) There is no natural purpose for the behavior.
3) 98% are NOT afflicted with this UNNATURAL desire.
If they can force YOU to promote and endorse their deviant behavior, they can more easily VICTIMIZE YOUR CHILDREN, when they are most vulnerable and their natural desires have not yet developed.
So when science discovers the cause of homosexuality, parents will be able to abort a fetus that has it. Science can solve all of our problems, can’t it?
The current socialist mayor of NYC is married to a “former” lesbian...
How sad to describe your “being” by what you like to do with your genitalia.
ridiculous
As a red blooded American male, I am attracted to MANY women I meet, and yet I have managed to stay faithful to my wife for 20 years now.
What amazes me is that in America’s “self-improvement” culture - EVERYTHING is a choice. there are 1000 diets for fat people, if not, there is surgery. Don’t like your looks? There is plastic surgery. There is counseling and rehab for everything from alcohol to drugs to anger management. Movies stars even go to expenses clinics for sex-addiction.
But we are told - gays and their behavior simply can NOT be changed.
Undoubtedly, one of these daughters has discovered that one of her grandkids or relatives is “gay.” And now she must be gay-friendly. What a bore!
So they have the same broken moral compass as their vile father. Not surprised.
Is this Lynda Bird or Luci Baines?
The latter was kind of pretty as a teenager IIRC.
Once again the faggies rule; the 2% over the 98%. Sick.
I really don’t think it’s a choice. However that doesn’t mean that it isn’t some sort of disorder. Depression isn’t a choice. Or OCD or Bipolar Disorder or any number of other afflictions, for that matter.
And being an adulterer is not a choice, right?
Desires and all that, all hail Saint JFK.
Well, with LBJ, his position would surely have depended on his political calculus, and whether he saw political benefit in either one.
I don’t recall him being anything but a cutthroat socialist hack painfully aware of the polls and concerned for his place in history.
I'm very confident that nasty old LBJ would have agreed with his contemporary of the time Bob Hope, shortly after California passed the 1975 Consenting Adult Sex Bill .....
Left wingers keep pushing ideological historical revisionism. LBJ was aware that men liked to sleep with other men. He didn’t approve of it.
It’s like P3losi’s stupidity regarding George Washington approving of Obamacare. He was a w are of doctors. He didn’t include them in the Constitution still.
I don’t think it’s a single conscious choice. I think it’s a fetish that comes from a collection of personality traits, some that people might be born with and some that develop over time, exposure and experience. Like any other fetish. Do people choose to be especially attracted to feet? Or blondes? Or bondage? No, all they know is that they are.
But that being true doesn’t change anything. Not all fetishes are harmless, or healthy, or for that matter— legal.
Of course it is choice.
But I guess when you make bad ones you try to convince yourself you had no choice.
“Gay” marriage leads to fag couples adopting children. That is CHILD ABUSE.
“L.B.J’s Daughter: Being Gay Is Not a Choice”
Neither is being a pedophile. That doesnt make it normal, or healthy or something that should be socially celebrated.