At this point, there are a couple of items of interest in this case.
1. What do you think of the Harry Reid connection?
2. What does misrepresenting the tortoise endangerment do to past court rulings that utilized those assumptions?
3. What does BLM overkill do to their case; i.e., bringing snipers and heavy artillery to a cow ranch?
4. What do the “1st amendment zones” say about the Fed’s opinions of the American people?
1. What do you think of the Harry Reid connection?Since it comes from Alex Jones, I ignore it until it comes from a reputable source. Jones is a loon. Believes the Bushes and Clintons are lizard people, like David Icke. He's always talking something crazy.
2. What does misrepresenting the tortoise endangerment do to past court rulings that utilized those assumptions?Not a thing until that misrepresentation is proven in court.
3. What does BLM overkill do to their case; i.e., bringing snipers and heavy artillery to a cow ranch?Nothing. If there's no law against it, overkill is purely a matter of opinion - and has no legal bearing.
4. What do the “1st amendment zones” say about the Fed’s opinions of the American people?Well, since "free speech zones" have existed since 1988 and have been discussed and approved by the Supreme Court in Edwards v. South Carolina, Brown v. Louisiana, Cox v. Louisiana, and Adderley v. Florida, I don't have much of an opinion about 'em. Does it pass the 4-part TPM test that was set up by the Court? If it does, then it's legal. *shrugs* If we don't want them to exist, we need to outlaw them.