Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WayneS

Can be but the Constitution does not require it to be. And since it is not ... the full powers of the enumerated Congressional legislative authority apply.


90 posted on 04/10/2014 12:58:26 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: taxcontrol
Yes, but by that argument the government could claim they 'need' 1,000,000 acres of land to build a 100 acre national park. That would be an unreasonable claim.

Regardless of the powers with which they have been entrusted by the People, it is reasonable to demand that our government exercise those powers in a reasonable manner.

There is NO reason whatsoever for the federal government to own any more land than is absolutely necessary to construct and maintain those types facilities, and only those types of facilities, enumerated in the constitution.

Your argument is really nothing more than acquiescence to an unnecessary expansion of power by the federal government - and I oppose ALL unnecessary expansions of the federal government.

104 posted on 04/10/2014 1:09:11 PM PDT by WayneS (Help Control Politician Overpopulation - Spay or Neuter Your Senator or Congressman Today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol

How long have you worked for the BLM?


280 posted on 04/11/2014 6:05:18 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson