Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
but only by using nukes.

We only had 2 nukes, and they were both used on Japan. In fact, Japan was still fighting after Nagasaki, and only surrendered after we lied that we had a 3rd bomb ready to level Tokyo.

So we would have had to invade Germany, which would have costed twice as many lives if we had to invade Japan.

20 posted on 04/10/2014 2:39:12 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (GO WISCONSIN BADGERS GO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Plutonium bomb production was relatively rapid. In his authorized biography, Oppenheimer revealed that he'd promised Truman that a bomb to destroy Tokyo would be ready by August 17th. He had no reason to lie.

There were supposedly a total of six bombs [four new Plutonium bombs plus the Uranium and Plutonium bombs already dropped on Japan] when Oppenheimer left Los Alamos at the end of September, 1945. This fact was roughly verified by the Russians, who were apparently told by Klaus Fuchs that the Allies could "threaten them with no more than five bombs."

Four or five bombs could have destroyed Germany or the Soviet Union for all practical purposes in 1945.

46 posted on 04/10/2014 3:05:59 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Those nukes were meant to be dropped on Germany, but Germany was defeated before they were ready. We didn’t start a nuclear weapons project because we feared Japan had one. We developed them because we thought we were in a race against German nuclear scientists.


53 posted on 04/10/2014 3:24:25 PM PDT by OldNewYork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson