Posted on 04/10/2014 5:09:51 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Forty years is roughly the length of a working lifetimeand long enough for history to have taken some unexpected turns. And to have proved that long-term forecasts based on extrapolations of existing trends usually end up wide of the mark.
The list of failed prophecies from the 1970s is rather long. The conventional wisdom of the time was more than usually unreliable.
Example: the Club of Rome's Limits to Growth report in 1972, predicting that the world was running out of oil and other natural resources. For a while that seemed right, as the 1973 and 1979 OPEC oil price hikes led to gas lines in the United States.
But in the longer run, as the Club came to recognize, engineers and entrepreneurs found more oil and other natural resources and figured out how to get them to market. Capitalism works, and in ways planners dont expect.
Another common assumption in the early 1970s was that Britain was a fusty, antiquated country that had to join the modern, up-to-date Common Market (now the European Union). Europe's war-devastated economies had actually grown faster than Britain's in the quarter-century after World War II.
Fast forward to today. It is Europe that looks out of date, with zero economic growth and economies smothered by sclerotic regulation, overlarge welfare states and the poorly conceived euro.
Britain got rid of much of that under Margaret Thatcher and John Major. And thanks to Gordon Brown, it wisely avoided the euro. Now it's growing solidly while the continent lags.
A third bit of conventional wisdom from the 1970s is that Asia generally and China in particular could never grow because of the burden of overpopulation.
But Asias state-led capitalism and Deng Xiaopings adoption of that model in 1978 has made Asia the growth capital of the world. Hundreds of millions have risen from poverty.
As for the population bomb, the biggest problem for Asia and China today is low birth rates and a contracting work force. These stopped growth in Japan and may do so elsewhere.
A final thing taken for granted in the 1970s was the enduring strength of the Soviet Union. It was, after all, ramping up its military even as America was recoiling from defeat in Vietnam.
Many seers predicted that the Soviet and Western models would converge, and that Soviet living standards would approach Americas.
It turned out that the very few leaders who predicted the demise of the Soviet Union--Ronald Reagan, Daniel Patrick Moynihan--got it right. America, once it got the will, could outclass the Soviet military, and economic stagnation and ethnic tensions brought down the "evil empire."
There are common threads running through these mistaken projections. One is the extrapolation of recent trends far into the future. History doesnt proceed like a straight line on a graph; sometimes the lines bend.
Another is the assumption that progress means ever-larger states and increasing superintendence by international elites.
But much unpredicted progress has occurred when nations freed markets from the grip of centralized states and private sectors produced innovation that the supposed experts failed to anticipate.
A third common thread builds on the insight of economist Herbert Stein, who said that anything that could not go on forever would some day stop.
This prompts a question: Which of the widely accepted prophecies of today will seem as invalid today as the Club of Rome report? I have my own nominations, made with some confidence since actuarial tables tell me I will not be here in 40 years.
One is that the Chinese Communist regime will remain in place. Remember that it seemed on the verge of tottering in Tiananmen Square in 1989. Its lasted 25 years since, thanks largely to robust economic growth.
But certain dates in history1789, 1917, 1991tell us that sudden upheaval is possible when a regimes legitimacy seems exhausted.
And will todays conventional wisdom that the planet faces inevitable warming seem as risible in 2054 as the Club of Romes prediction of exhausted resources seems today?
We are told that the science is settled, when it is in the nature of science never to be settled, but always to be subject to verification and revision. I think were in for more of that.
Finally, those widely shared views that Americas best days are over. Thats never been a good bet and I suspect it never will be.
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Sad thing is I BELIEVED it at the time.
When you're 10 years old in 1977, and Orson Welles tells you such things in scary 16mm movies, plus he sells Paul Masson wine, you KNOW that as a kid you need to listen.
Turns out that Woodsy the Owl, Paul Erlich, and Uncle Smiley were full of $hit propagandists.
I still love the outdoors, and nature.
But I pretty much figured out these pinko's number by age 20.
Since then, I've had such a visceral hatred for such people. And their attempts at brainwashing.
Hey, teacher, leave those kids alone.
mark.
¿Por qué no?
/johnny
bump
I didn't believe anything I was told until I could verify it myself.
/johnny
Yes, the Left was preaching the end of the world. The religious right, in my family was teaching me that I would be raptured away, would never drive a car, graduate from high school etc. I believed them. I thought I would never get laid!. Now the same bunch were saying that about my kids when they were little. I had a hard time biting my tongue. Now my kids are starting to drive about to graduate etc.
Just makes me sick the way we all grow up surrounded by mythology from authorities in our lives.
that’s what I was thinking while reading the article.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.