How about, Second Amendment is my permit, disregard the rest?
This will not be a good year for gun control - they should have waited until 2016. The NRA will kick-in and the end result will be nothing, most likely (and thankfully).
Those are in order of popularity among criminals. So what makes anyone think that piling on yet another law for criminals to ignore and break - while infringing even more upon the rights of law abiding citizens - will make any significant difference? (here's a hint, it won't)
Two, if you don't believe me, and lack even the modicum of common sense to see #1 look around. Several states have enacted "universal" background checks. Guess what, they don't work. They have resulted in an extremely low number of rejected buyers. I can hear you lib lurkers out there thinking "Ah but it does work!" No, it doesn't. The published statistics on that do not say how many of those rejections were in error. There is a known, but small error rate of people who are mis-identified in the database. It takes time and effort to correct.
Three. Go back and read the (real) 2nd Amendment. What part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?
504 registered voters and that’s supposed to accurately reflect how the millions of WA state residents will vote? How many of those polled were in Seattle vs the rest of the state? How many were of the demographic likely to crawl over broken glass to vote in these next elections to send a message vs. brain dead Seattle liberals too busy getting high.....?
Confused Nanny State PING!
“Initiative 594 would require all firearm sales, including those at gun shows and conducted online, to be predicated on a background check of the buyer.”
Once the people find out that both of those are already true, that will get rejected.