The dems tried to blame the attempted bombing on the TEA Party because the bomb was a fertilizer bomb, which just by coincidence I’m sure, matched the dems talking points before the attempted bombing comparing the TEA Party to Tim McVeigh wannabes.
Yes, I remember that.
They tried to do it after the Gabby Giffords shooting, and after the James Holmes shooting in Aurora, Colorado as well.
I believe there have been other attempts in addition to those.
In the case of the Giffords shooting, they tried to pin the blame directly on Sarah Palin. To do so, they ignored the fact that one of the fatalities was a Republican-appointed federal judge named John Roll.
The big difference with the attempted bombing in NYC and the shootings they tried to blame on the TEA Party, there was no orchestrated talking points campaign from the dems before the shootings only after.
With the attempted bombing in NYC there was an orchestrated talking points campaign before the attempted bombing and after the attempted bombing.
Are we supposed to assume the terrorist are so in tune with the news the terrorist simply picked up on the dems talking points campaign comparing the TEA Party to a bunch of Tim McVeigh wannabes and then the terrorist just “spontaneously” planned a fertilizer car bomb to match the dems talking points?
If that’s the case then I guess we need to look at ALL the terrorist attacks, attempted attacks, and planned attacks for the last 13 years and see just how many match the dems orchestrated news stories before the attacks and their talking points campaign after the attack.
I even bet the terrorist were so in tune with the news they picked up on the dems praising Peanuts Carter at their convention then the terrorist just “spontaneously” planned to attack Benghazi.