[B4Ranch]

A quick background as to why the BLM should not be harassing Cliven Bundy. This issue goes all the way back to the Confederation Papers, prior to the writing of our US Constitution.

Please remember that the Supreme Court has reversed more than 150 of earlier Supreme Court decisions on natural law. Is that what you would consider as someone being consistent and reliable in interpreting the Constitution?

The Resolution of 1780, "the federal trust respecting public lands obligated the united States to extinguish both their governmental jurisdiction and their title to land that achieved statehood."

In the Constitutional Convention of 1787, The Charter of Liberty contained these words, "The new Federal Government is an agent serving the states.", "The delegated powers are few and defined", "All powers not listed are retained by the states or the people", "The Resolution of 1780 formed the basis upon which Congress was required to dispose of territorial and public lands", "All laws shall be made by the Congress of the United States". (not agency bureaucrats!)

That should be sufficient for you to determine who all public lands belong to, hint - NOT the Federal Government!

"The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, it's meaning does not alter. That which it meant when adopted. it means now". So said the Supreme Court in South Carolina v United States in 1905

Articles of Confederation, Article VI, clause 1 All engagements entered into before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. In Article IX "... no State shall be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States."

Formation of a "more perfect union" does not absolve that union of prior engagements, including those obligations establish by the resolution of 1780 and the Articles of Confederation.

Our government system is established by compact, not between the Government and the State Governments but between the States as Sovereign Communities. By James Madison 1821 (This is what make the County Sheriffs the highest law enforcement officer in that County and gives him/her the authority to tell the BLM, the FBI or any other Federal Agency to get out of the County or they will be arrested and jailed.)

What I have written here is but a short piece of the process that the Founder went through to establish our Constitution and system of government.

Please view these videos and see if they don't change your mind about whether or not Cliven Bundy is in the wrong by defying the BLM.

1of3 Stephen Pratt speaking to Sheriffs at WSSA conference

2of3 Stephen Pratt speaking to Sheriffs at WSSA conference

3of3 Stephen Pratt speaking to Sheriffs at WSSA conference

Here's one that shows why the Sheriff of Clark County is duty bound to keep the BLM and all Federal agents from arresting Cliven Bundy.

Steven Pratt, Bound by Oath to Support THIS Constitution,

[ronnie raygun]

Networks ar to busy with feel good stories or human interest stories

[saywhatagain]

Only what you expect from a Soviet style propaganda media. No surprise here.

The only surprise anymore is if anyone did anything about it.

Or a congress critter stood up to inform and educate the masses. That aint goin to happen.

[Pelham]

bttt

[1010RD]

Because they’re the propaganda arm of the Progressives.

[Red Steel]

That’s what I expected from these Bolsheviks, TASS news agencies.

[ifinnegan]

Thanks for posting this.

Newsbusters is Consistently excellent.

[Beowulf9]

I still don’t understand. WHY didn’t he pay the fees?

[Valpal1]

Best explanation of the environmentalist roots of this conflict that I’ve seen yet.

[TigersEye]

I’m surprised that the Crony Jornolist Networks have reported anything at all.

[grobdriver]

For study and reference.

[wastoute]

Here is an idea. Similar to what BLM is trying to do to Bundy we need to insist that every politician pay a “grazing tax” on their office. We could pay off the national debt!