Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dainbramaged; kingattax

Actually, if you read the article, she is calling for HIGHER standards for women earlier in their testing, not lower standards. The lack of high standards earlier means women aren’t being conditioned for success. Her second point seems like something I’d want to confirm, however:

“She called specifically for holding women to higher physical fitness standards earlier on in their training and also for women to be given the opportunity to take the course a second time if they fail the first attempt — an opportunity which men have always been allowed.”


54 posted on 04/21/2014 12:35:58 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: dangus

“Actually, if you read the article, she is calling for HIGHER standards for women earlier in their testing, not lower standards.”

If the military had those higher, tougher standards for training and testing for women earlier, they would get complaints (and likely lawsuits) that the physical fitness standards for women are too high and discriminatory.

I bet ultimately they will end up dropping their physical fitness standards for everyone (men and women) and then we can all be happy pretending that the average woman is equal in strength to the average man.


110 posted on 04/21/2014 2:05:55 PM PDT by -YYZ- (Strong like bull, smart like tractor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson