Replies

But.....but.....they said they implemented a new algorithm, based on a ping, never used before, that took into account the Doppler Effect, and it was all so conclusive they held a press conference before the entire world and announced the plane crashed in the southern Indian Ocean.....after they informed the families via text message, of course.

Fox and hounds, and slight of hand: Red herrings. Everybody’s been chasing one. A plane under the command of a Mohammedan pilot and co-pilot, from a Mohammedan nation’s civil air authority telling us what’s what from the onset; knowingly directing search teams to the wrong area for the first three days. Now obviously desiring to wrap it up, and shelve it all away. MH370 has been stripped down, refitted, and will be cloned as BA1517, arriving JFK with a surprise cargo. MH370 most likely never left Malaysian airspace. If you “escape” from a prison, what is the one place they would never think to search for you? The prison.

'The reason investigators were forced to adopt a new algorithm to calculate the last known location of MH370 was because there was no global positioning system following the aircraft as the transponder went off 45 minutes into the flight.'

Heh. Now the truth comes out. I've been critical of the 'data' used to establish their 'graphical depictions' of the analysis of the ping data wondering out loud what the margin of error would be.

Now we know (if it's taken as fact) that they relied upon 'a newly adopted algorithm'. If they didn't produce datasets from multiple algorithms, I have only 1 question:

What are the odds of detecting signals along that trajectory that weren't, in fact, from the actual black boxes?

Just wondering out loud: Is it possible to drop a pinger locator anywhere in the world and detect 'false signals' on those frequencies? (that question is mostly sarcastic and rhetorical; I could be in left field on that)

This just gets weirder and weirder...