In December of 1948 Laurance Duggan, second generation Rockefeller man, fell from the 16th floor of his Manhattan office, and the ME's office ruled that it was either an accident or suicide. He had on his overcoat, scarf, and only one overshoe. The other one was found in his office, apparently in his rush to jump out the window he only put on one shoe. That would be 20 December 1948. According to the Wikipedia:
Laurence "Larry" Duggan (1905-December 20, 1948), was head of the South American desk at the United States Department of State during World War II. In 1948, Duggan fell to his death from the window of his office in New York, ten days after being questioned by the Federal Bureau of Investigation about whether he had had contacts with Soviet intelligence. For many years he was widely thought to be an innocent and loyal public servant who was driven to suicide by unfounded accusations. In the 1990s, evidence from decrypted Soviet telegrams was revealed which indicated he had engaged in espionage for the Soviet Union.
Now, on the other hand, Alger Hiss, of similar qualifications, lived to be 92.
Yes, every spy does not die by committing suicide.
Most spies do not commit suicide.
So what would make Duggan put on his coat, scarf, and one shoe and fling himself out his office window ?
That's for the reader to cogitate on.
Some background on Duggan:
Duggan's father, with JDR Sr.'s lawyer, Elihu Root, founded the Rockefeller's
Institute of International Education in 1919.
Regarding the "foundations":
Notice use of the word "governance", not government, when "good governance" is written or spoken of by minions of globalism:
From
http://grammarist.com/usage/governance/:
"Governance and government are interchangeable in the sense the process of governing, but they differ in other senses. Government often refers to the governing body itself, while governance often refers to the act of governing. So members of a government are engaged in governance.
Meanwhile, governance is often the better word for the administration of nongovernmental organizations (corporations, for example), while government works better in reference to the public administration of nations, states, municipalities, etc."
Thus governance would be more in the imperial sense of a edicts or decrees, while the world government connotes more of a sense of a public instutition, that is, a government by the people governed.
The tax-exempt foundations rule over national governments, which rule as vassals over the people. In the US, as in other nations, they create and implement government policy through their staff members which are placed in key positions in all three branches of government. They create educational policy through, once again, through having their staff members well-placed in the educational system. They even go so far as to control religious denominations, and consequently their teaching, or doctrine, through foundation staff members holding important positions in the leading religious denominations.
Consider the
World Policy Institute, founded in 1961 as the "Fund for Education Concerning World Peace through World Law" by bankers
H. B. Hollins and
C. Douglas Dillon. It's charter sounds completely "benevolent"; this allows the minions it employs to exert the influence their employers desire under the guise of supposed charitable purposes. No one dares to ask - why does this organization exist ? What is its purpose ? If any of the general public ask, they're labeled conspiracy wackos. If anyone that works for such foundations at a high enough level to be "in the know", and they dare to not reliably follow through on the silent completion of their tasks, or perhaps they threaten to publicize damning information - all such instances of "getting a case of the scruples" are dealt with by a permanent retirement. The only way a person can speak out is by joining the conspiracy chorus, but throw in some off-the-wall wackiness, like racism, aliens, etc., and at the same time calling for a return to the gold standard. Doing that ensures that most people will ignore the few truthful pieces of the puzzle the person reveals, and also preaches that the "solution" is actually only the gold standard, which would also be controlled by the same financial elites.