http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/02/chicago-coldest-winter-ever_n_5078201.html
This after democrats said that our factories emitting CO2 have been creating a greenhouse effect for the past 200 years. so if that were true , if their global warming were true then we couldn't have had the coldest winter ever after 200 years of "global warming".
Conclusion : 1.global warming is a lie. 2. a lot of what else democrats and the news media and scientists say is a lie;
I shut up a whole room of liberals with these words. a liberal from chicago said it was the coldest winter there this year. so i said that and liberals were fuming!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/02/chicago-coldest-winter-ever_n_5078201.html
This after democrats said that our factories emitting CO2 have been creating a greenhouse effect for the past 200 years. so if that were true , if their global warming were true then we couldn't have had the coldest winter ever after 200 years of "global warming".
Conclusion : 1.global warming is a lie. 2. a lot of what else democrats and the news media and scientists say is a lie;
I shut up a whole room of liberals with these words. a liberal from chicago said it was the coldest winter there this year. so i said that and liberals were fuming!
From "Aliens Cause Global Warming: A Caltech Lecture by Michael Crichton"
To an outsider, the most significant innovation in the global warming controversy is the overt reliance that is being placed on models. Back in the days of nuclear winter, computer models were invoked to add weight to a conclusion: These results are derived with the help of a computer model.
But now, large-scale computer models are seen as generating data in themselves. No longer are models judged by how well they reproduce data from the real world-increasingly, models provide the data.
As if they were themselves a reality. And indeed they are, when we are projecting forward. There can be no observational data about the year 2100. There are only model runs. This fascination with computer models is something I understand very well.
Richard Feynmann called it a disease. I fear he is right. Because only if you spend a lot of time looking at a computer screen can you arrive at the complex point where the global warming debate now stands. Nobody believes a weather prediction twelve hours ahead. Now were asked to believe a prediction that goes out 100 years into the future?
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/07/09/aliens-cause-global-warming-a-caltech-lecture-by-michael-crichton/
“Study Links California Drought To Global Climate Change”
False. There is no link. The study only attempts to establish a link. Believe it or not.