Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN
QUOTE: "Actually, the Bir (sic) Bang does not postulate that ‘all matter’ was concentrated in a singularity.

Silly me! Guess that's what passes for public school science. To be sure, I read the NASA website, and took the following statement

"...when the entire Universe was contained in a single point in space."

to mean all matter as well. Thanks for clarifying my simplistic reading! You advise NASA to clarify their misleading statements.

You may also want to correct Stephen Hawking as well, who stated

At this time, the Big Bang, all the matter in the universe, would have been on top of itself. The density would have been infinite. It would have been what is called, a singularity.

You're not half as clever as you think!

59 posted on 04/28/2014 6:57:37 PM PDT by jimmyray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: jimmyray

Poor you. Ever heard of gravity as a function of mass/matter? Hawking and Penrose came up with the infinite gravity in a black hole. What escapes from a black hole? A special type of radiation, but not matter. Want to try again? Your effort to insult me failed, skippy.


61 posted on 04/28/2014 7:16:08 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson