Ungland... the only shock is it's not a bunch of goathumpers...
Posted on 04/25/2014 9:14:44 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
A mother-of-nine who claims £38,000 a year in handouts and demanded a bigger council house for her huge family is pregnant again - this time with twins.
Cheryl Prudham, 32, and her husband Robert, 29, are set to receive at least a further £1,400 in handouts when the baby girls arrive.
Mrs Prudham said she will 'not be made to feel guilty' for having children' as she and her husband both work part-time.
Last year the couple, from Sittingbourne, Kent - who were living in a three-bedroom council house at the time - said they were entitled to a bigger house, because they both work part-time.
Eventually the couple were able to arrange a house swap and they moved to a £200,000 property, also in Kent, the Sun reports.
But the expectant mother is still not happy with the swap - organised via Facebook with a family looking to downsize - because she had to move away from her preferred area of Sittingbourne.
She admits her huge brood were not especially planned because she and her husband do not like using contraception.
Speaking after her bid for a new house last year, she said: 'In the past I have been on contraception but I got pregnant with the coil and the pill just doesn't settle well with me.
'We don't use condoms and me and Rob have never talked about it.
'I did rely on benefits before but I am motivated to be more than a mother.'
And she admitted: 'I was surprised by the cost of our kids in the end.'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Not much different than us, really.
Ain’t socialism grand?
Whatever’s going on here obviously has nothing to do with race and would affect any group of people the same way...
>She admits her huge brood were not especially planned because she and her husband do not like using contraception.
Wonderful. More welfare babies pinched off and added to the public teat. Why not get your plumbing neutered if you refuse to prevent adding more load to the overtaxed public?
Nothing wrong with big families....after all native Europeans are at risk of being outbred by Third-Worlders.
But perhaps those who wish to raise such a large brood would be better off in a more rural environment where the costs of raising children would be much lower.
Shouldn’t we be happy at least the children weren’t aborted?
Ungland... the only shock is it's not a bunch of goathumpers...
Well, they are a bunch of cute kids, but all ten of them are learning at an early age how to live on government handouts. Perhaps they’ll all grow up to have ten kids apiece…and on and on.
More importantly, I'm sure the children are happy they weren't aborted.
Perhaps they’d make a better impression if the husband wore something other than a wife-beater.
The dad can afford tattoos but not a house?
Is she Mexican?.
Yes, let’s have native families have their 1.2 children per household while Muslims breed like rabbits.
Do you agree to the per child tax credit that we have currently?
I agree with it to a point, and that point is where you pay $0.
No one should get back more in their income tax return than they paid in.
My mother’s grandmother and grandfather raised 11 children at the turn of the 19th century. One died in infancy. Back in those days the women stayed home and the men worked, and there were no modern convinces. They made it. My grandma never had her own new pair of shoes until she married. Most of her clothes were hand me downs, even her wedding dress was borrowed.
Mom and grandmother could never understand this constant consumption today of consumer goods. I guess I’ve inherited it too. I’m as low maintenance, cheap date as they come. A cup of coffee and a night looking t the stars is ideal.
Idiocracy was a pre-emptive documentary
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.