Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie
1. I am not a lawyer.

2. The only Supreme Court case from the 1920's covering this topic was between Oklahoma and Texas over the Red River. The Court decided to go with the vegetation line and also listed the surveys from the 1800's. The way I read the finding the land which was in dispute either belonged to Oklahoma or Texas. No Federal Government was mention. Therefore this land on the Red River either belongs to Texas or Oklahoma, but not the Federal Government.

8 posted on 04/26/2014 10:33:20 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lockbox

Grouping some info from various sources;

The Red River Boundary Compact

http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/NR/htm/NR.12.htm

or

multiple articles here:

https://www.google.com/webhp?sa=N&tab=lw#q=red+river+boundary+compact

***********

If you can get the following to load it is the genisis of this BLM land review. It list the goals which culminate in 2017.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/219455667/OFO-Newsletter-Final-i

********

If you can get the following to load it is the genisis of this BLM land review. It list the goals which culminate in 2017.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/219455667/OFO-Newsletter-Final-i

***********

Another case from back in 1986 in a US Federal District Court in Oklahoma. Currington v Henderson 1986.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/220303420/Currington-v-Henderson-1986


11 posted on 04/26/2014 11:29:11 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson