Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625

Again, this isn’t about Love. It’s about your post 88.


107 posted on 04/28/2014 9:37:10 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("Compromise" means you've already decided you lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: Colonel_Flagg
Again, this isn’t about Love. It’s about your post 88.

OK, I said "Personally, I think it's sufficient that she's in favor of any sort of reduction in government support for abortion, which is a position that is very much more pro-life than her Dem challenger."

What I mean is that as long as the candidate:

(1) Is in favor of reducing abortion in some way (in Mia's case, ending federal funding for it), and

(2) Will not vote in favor of any pro-abortion legislation, nor vote against any pro-life legislation, nor make public statements against pro-lifers or supporting pro-aborts

Then that candidate has my support even if she refrains from making statements like "I vow to make abolishing abortion my #1 priority while in office".

110 posted on 04/28/2014 9:51:05 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson